His interview with influencer Adin Ross earlier this week is part of a broader effort to answer Kamala Harris’s nomination with an unabashed courtship of too-online misogynists.

UFC head Dana White, the wife beater, is “a fighter.” North Korean dictator Kim Jong Un is “very tough,” while China’s Xi Jinping is “strong.” Elon Musk, the transphobe who has turned X into a megaphone for bigotry, is a “genius.” So said Donald Trump during his 75-minute livestreamed interview with Adin Ross, the 23-year-old gamer and influencer.

The adjectives and verbs for all of the women they discussed were very different. Kamala Harris was said to be “weak” and “stupid,” Nancy Pelosi and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez were “crazy,” and AOC was described as “ranting” and “screaming.” And, of course, there was that appellation Trump applies to every woman—most famously to Hillary Clinton in their final debate in 2016—who doesn’t supplicate herself before him: “nasty.”

In other words, the interview was vintage Trump—the latest of a million-plus examples proving that, no matter how many smarmy advisers and gullible political reporters insist otherwise, he is incapable of changing who he is for political expediency. He’s an out-and-proud misogynist who intends to appeal to closeted misogynists—and no one should be happier about that fact than Kamala Harris.

  • solsangraal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    5 months ago

    only a matter of time until trump and maga start screeching “gEt RiD oF wOmEnS sUfFrAgE,” since it’ll be women who destroy him the most on election day

    • jjjalljs@ttrpg.network
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      5 months ago

      I think Thiel already wrote an essay about that.

      https://time.com/4529800/donald-trump-women-voters-2/

      The movement slightly pays homage to Silicon Valley billionaire (and Trump supporter) Peter Thiel, who wrote in 2009 that giving women the right to vote was bad for democracy: “Since 1920, the vast increase in welfare beneficiaries and the extension of the franchise to women—two constituencies that are notoriously tough for libertarians—have rendered the notion of ‘capitalist democracy’ into an oxymoron.”

          • sigmaklimgrindset@sopuli.xyz
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            5 months ago

            It’s partially a joke, but there is non-negligible subsection of privileged gay men who believe than any form of femininity is beneath them, to the point of misogyny. They believe that trans women, femme presenting NBs, and even femme leaning cis gay men are lesser than them. Hence the joke among the queer community that “they hate women more than they like men”.

            Reading Peter Thiel’s essay, it certainly seems to reflect the mentality of those types of people I’ve interacted with IRL. Fortunately they are drowned out by the rest of the queer community.

      • solsangraal
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        5 months ago

        gee, who would have ever guessed women’s right to vote would be bad for a party that wants to oppress women

    • arefx@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 months ago

      True, but plenty of men are vehemently against trump as well, like myself! Proudly!

      The women are going to win this for Kamala though. I wonder why they used to not let them vote…

      • solsangraal
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        5 months ago

        it wasn’t until the 70s that women could open their own bank account without a man’s name attached