Archived link

On Saturday [September 21], Tibetan activists convened outside the Musée Guimet in Paris to protest the museum’s decision to replace exhibition materials that identify certain artifacts as Tibetan by replacing it with the Chinese name for the region. Activists claim the change to the language is problematic for deferring to a Chinese political narrative that’s historically aimed to erase Tibetan cultural identity from public spaces.

The mass protest, which some sources estimate attracted 800 demonstrators, followed a report in the French newspaper Le Monde alleging that Musée Guimet and the Musée du quai Branly, two prominent Parisian museums that house collections of Asian art, altered their exhibition materials cataloging Tibetan artifacts as deriving instead from then Chinese term “Xizang Autonomous Region.” According to the same report, the Musée Guimet renamed its Tibetan art galleries as deriving from the “Himalayan world.”

A handful of Tibetan cultural advocacy groups based in France penned letters to both museums, requesting formal meetings to discuss the reasons behind and implications of the terminology changes, a request that activists say was accepted by Musée du quai Branly, but not it’s peer Musée Guimet.

  • solsangraal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    34
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    2 months ago

    wtf france is this real? of course i have no place to criticize, coming from united embarrassment of america

    • maniii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 months ago

      Having a bias should not deny you having a voice. Human beings should be understanding and empathetic of each other within reason.

      Xitler or Putler must be condemned and prevented from having any voice. Tibetans denied their homeland should be supported and voiced.

    • Akasazh@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      2 months ago

      They did remove all tex Mex hard shell tacos from stores after they learned they weren’t really Mexican.

      I mean it doesn’t weigh up to this, but it holds some equivalence

      • AwkwardLookMonkeyPuppet@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 months ago

        Tex-mex isn’t supposed to be Mexican. It’s a unique culinary cuisine that resulted from the large number of Mexicans in Texas. It’s a fusion of American and Mexican foods.

        • Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          2 months ago

          people love to ignore the first half of texmex, it’s like how most of the “Indian” dishes people are used to were invented in london just some decades ago.