• BrikoXOPM
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 hours ago

    In particular the ones taking the side of the Brazilian government against musk.

    Brazil doesn’t have USA’s First Amendment. So no matter which stance people have on what it should be, it was legally valid.

    And the whole fight was a political farce as Musk personally is known to comply with government censorship. Again, you can argue that the law is wrong and should be changed, but it’s legally valid.

    • atzanteol@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      Brazil doesn’t have USA’s First Amendment. So no matter which stance people have on what it should be, it was legally valid.

      I’m arguing “should” not “can”. It’s just another case of when libs will gladly dispose of their values when it suits their short-term goals.