(ignore the old TV)

an ESPN+ exclusive fight has literally nothing to do with the football

  • Honytawk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    54
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 months ago

    Isn’t the whole point of sports to be able to advertise?

        • ivanafterall ☑️@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          I thought sports was about wealthy, unscrupulous white men fighting each other over the right to have the most-talented black men go to work in their fields.

      • Honytawk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        Nah, that is to keep potential clients interested.

        They keep adding rules to the sport to make it more “TV viewing friendly”, meaning more breaks to show ads. I mean, the superbowl is just ads with sport attached.

        • mhague@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          2 months ago

          Look at the sports with systemic ad presence vs sports where it’s all “grass roots.” (The grass roots ones are mostly gone.)

          Most top sports are incredibly expensive to keep running and the ones that become infested with ads are the ones that stick around for us to enjoy. If you follow less popular sports you’ll consider yourself lucky to bring in ads and sponsors.