• TowardsTheFuture
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    I mean yeah did we expect more than 25-33%? They showed 33% w/o frame generation on their own benchmarks. Frame generation is where this is meant to be good. Which like, is a bad gimmick and I don’t think you should base your entire new line of cards around it, but AI!!! And shareholders or whatever.

    • Fermion@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      It’s a really weird marketing play, because the top end card is where you should get great performance without relying on frame gen. Frame gen makes the most sense as a feature to somewhat bridge the gap on mid tier cards. Low end cards are too weak to perform well even with frame gen. I can’t imagine that someone dropping $2000 on a card is going to be enthusiastic about ai frames.

      • TowardsTheFuture
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Yeah its a wild thought, but I mean, what are they going to do? Lose money? Pfft.