• sp3ctr4l
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    23 hours ago

    I don’t think archaic is the word you mean… as the use of vagueing as a verb is fairly new, not fairly old.

    Archaic would be like… betwixt, hither, goodly, plain (meaning not very attractive), anon (meaning immediately), methinks…

    … words that once were commonly used, but have much more widely used modern replacements.

    Anyway, yes I’m familiar with the term vague posting, and I agree that it is a very likely etymological antecedent of vagueing.

    Doesn’t change that vagueing as a verb is more clumsy to use in a sentence which intends to specify an object.

    Both vague posting and vagueing work well to describe the actions of only a subject, but yeah, they are more awkward to use when you want to specify an object of the vague posting or vagueing.

    They can’t be conjugated on their own, to do that requires helper words, auxilliary verbs.

    On their own, they are always in the continuous tense.

    … Though I guess you could say vagues, vagued, vagueing…

    … but at that point I’d argue the connection to communicating in online posts is lost, and it would begin to apply to any kind of communication where a person is being vague, losing the specificity of ‘it’s not vague to those with insider/first-hand knowledge’.