• Dudewitbow
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    7 hours ago

    this is like saying donating to a guy who killed someone actively killing others is never uplifting news. Sure leave the school shooters alone

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      5 hours ago

      If that man was really responsible for those deaths then the killing would have stopped.

      The blood is on the hands of voters.

      • CileTheSane@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        14 minutes ago

        If that man was really responsible for those deaths then the killing would have stopped.

        If Luigi was really responsible for killing that guy in New York then arresting him would have caused the killings in New York to stop. The fact that people have been killed in New York since Luigi was arrested proves his arrest was pointless.

      • Dudewitbow
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        as CEO, even if you arent the one who made the executive decision to make the denials, they still have the power to change the internal policy. It’s a FAR well known issue that UHC denied a lot of coverage. He was outright complicit with it, and unlike most people, actually had the power to overturn the problem.

        • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          8
          ·
          5 hours ago

          Then we should be trying to solve that problem instead of throwing money at a rich kid murderer.