simple@lemm.ee to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agoSkyblivion, the fan remake of Oblivion in Skyrim's engine, nears completionwww.tweaktown.comexternal-linkmessage-square115fedilinkarrow-up1570arrow-down14 cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1566arrow-down1external-linkSkyblivion, the fan remake of Oblivion in Skyrim's engine, nears completionwww.tweaktown.comsimple@lemm.ee to Games@lemmy.worldEnglish · 1 day agomessage-square115fedilink cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected]
minus-squareGeniuslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down1·edit-24 hours agoI disagree with the fundamental assertion that software can be owned
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·3 hours agoAnd that’s completely valid. However, under the current legal framework, that simply isn’t the case.
minus-squareGeniuslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1arrow-down2·3 hours agoWhy are you using a state’s laws to determine your own sense of morality?
minus-squareNιƙƙιDιɱҽʂ@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·edit-22 hours agoPersonal beliefs and the laws to which you are upheld are two different things. I didn’t say I agree with the law. Why are you assuming my personal beliefs?
minus-squareGeniuslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·1 hour agoBecause you said what they say is important is more important. That sounds like a subjective opinion to me, not an interpretation of the law.
I disagree with the fundamental assertion that software can be owned
And that’s completely valid. However, under the current legal framework, that simply isn’t the case.
Why are you using a state’s laws to determine your own sense of morality?
Personal beliefs and the laws to which you are upheld are two different things. I didn’t say I agree with the law. Why are you assuming my personal beliefs?
Because you said what they say is important is more important. That sounds like a subjective opinion to me, not an interpretation of the law.