Basically title.

I’m wondering if a package manager like flatpak comes with any drawback or negatives. Since it just works on basically any distro. Why isn’t this just the default? It seems very convenient.

    • phx@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      The upside over Snaps is that they’re not so controlled by a central source

      I’d say they still share a couple downsides: a) use a lot of them and stuff is gonna get bloaty vs native packages

      b) updating a library etc for security on your system can still leave you with vulnerable apps where the packages aren’t updated

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Snaps are very much controlled by a central source. With flatpak you can add custom repos

      • Justin@lemmy.kde.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Generally using only a few flatpaks is where it’s generally “bloaty”. Adding more actually balances out the equation ans you have more apps using generally shared runtimes.