Fulton County district attorney is leading a sprawling case against the former president and his allies
The Georgia prosecutor leading a sprawling election interference case against Donald Trump has testified in court about allegations of misconduct levelled against her by the former president and his co-defendants ā questions that could potentially disqualify them from the case.
Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis began her testimony in an Atlanta courtroom on Thursday after defence attorneys questioned lead prosecutor Nathan Wade about the timeline of their relationship and the expenses they shared.
The attorneys had already admitted to their relationship but firmly rejected the āmeritlessā and āsalaciousā allegations as ābad-faithā attempts to see her kicked off a case that Mr Trump has baselessly labelled a conspiracy against him, according to court filings.
Thursdayās hearing is scrutinising allegations that the former couple financially benefited from Ms Willis hiring Mr Wade to prosecute the former presidentās case, which charges Mr Trump and more than a dozen co-defendants as part of a ācriminal enterpriseā to overturn the stateās election results in 2020.
āIāve been very anxious to have this conversation with you today,ā Ms Willis told defence attorney Ashleigh Merchant. āItās ridiculous that you lied on Monday and yet here we are. ā¦ Iām actually surprised that the hearing continued. But since it did, here I am.ā
Hiring someone you are actively involved with an intimate relationship with? If your sibling works at General Mills youāre immediately disqualified from the cereal box sweepstakes ffs, Willis knows better and should have done better. Especially when itās a case this big
How does it affect the case?
Weāre reading headlines about it, arenāt we? The court is taking time to resolve this allegation (as bullshit as itās looking) instead of what the case is actually about - prosecuting Trump.
America is on a deadline before the election, but the slow wheels of justice have to turn over this rock now because thereās enough evidence wrapped up in the claim to warrant a look, if only to disprove the allegations