• SorteKanin@feddit.dk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    368
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    It’s called “being privately owned” or “not having to suck up to shareholders”

    • Jackiedoodle@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      160
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yup hit the nail on the head. Not only can he make decisions that are risky that don’t pay off he is also 100 percent legally in his right to make decisions that lose the company money. If he feels it pushes the industry in the right direction.

    • Socsa@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      4 months ago

      Valve also has a very unique organizational structure where engineers manage themselves and pretty much all decisions are handled by horizontal committees.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      34
      ·
      4 months ago

      Costco is a public company, and their CEO just pushes back whenever investors ask why they don’t increase the membership fee or prices on staple goods.

      His answer is consistently “because we don’t need to”

      There’s definitely room for companies to have responsible growth. It’s just that most execs don’t care enough and just want a giant payday in the form of short term gains so they can do it again at another company.

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        It seems like no publicly traded C-suite cares about a brand anymore. Even though building a loyal userbase and delivering a consistent good product is essentially a long-term cash machine, they all just want the short-term growth and quarterly profit.

        • Tinidril@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          4 months ago

          I’ve given up on brands. It used to be that brand meant something, but most of the solid brands have been bought out and turned to crap for a quick buck now.

    • Vilian@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      epic are also private, the difference is that Gabe aren’t a dubmass CEO, now epic…

      • frezik@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        4 months ago

        That’s the facet people miss. Being privately owned gives you the opportunity to make better decisions. Doesn’t mean they’ll actually happen.

    • runjun@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      4 months ago

      I say this every time this comes up but if valve changes CEOs or talks about going public then run.

    • MataVatnik@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      ·
      4 months ago

      For profit publicly traded companies just look quarter to quarter and make the dumbest fucking decisions as a result

    • UsernameIsTooLon@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      4 months ago

      This is the key. I believe GabeN specifically owns 50.1% of Valve so that he can always make the final executive decisions.

    • jtmetcalfe@lemmy.sdf.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      4 months ago

      Yeah but neither is Epic - I think the key is that Gave isn’t driven by some technofascist plan to have everyone live in the metaverse or play games using brain implants or whatever

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      4 months ago

      Exactly. Steam is a money-printings g machine, and since they’re not publicly traded the owners make money asong as they’re profitable.

      With publicly-treaded companies, anyone who invests only makes money when the value of the stock goes up. Your company can make 5 billion dollars a second in profits, but still lose value to shareholders if the next quarter you aren’t making 6 billion a second.

        • cheesepotatoes@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Dividends are typically an extremely low percentage and I wouldn’t be so bold as to say the majority of stocks pay out dividends. I have ~20 different tech companies (some large, some small) in my portfolio and only one of them pays out dividends, as an example.

          • TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            4 months ago

            That’s not a good example. A lot of tech companies don’t pay dividends because they aren’t yet profitable. The share price fluctuates heavily because it’s all speculative.

            Longer term, profitable companies that pay consistent dividends are the bread and butter over a strong passive income generating portfolio. You can also get significant dividends just from index fund ETF.

            A million dollar portfolio can easily print $30000-$50000 a year in dividends depending on how it’s allocated

          • Neon 🇺🇦🇪🇺🇹🇼🇮🇱 @lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Tech Companies are the outlier.

            Invest in something more traditional and you’ll see that they do in fact pay out dividends

            That’s why i said it was the majority:

            The big shiny new tech ones don’t, but practically everyone else does

    • rtxn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      103
      ·
      4 months ago

      And DXVK. And VKD3D. And contributions to upstream Wine. And Gamescope. And the best handheld console thus far. And going against common industry practices by supporting the right to repair said console.

      • Vahtos@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        4 months ago

        Even still, compare all of the features steam has and the tools they provide to developers for the platform vs. their competition.

        • ditty@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          4 months ago

          Also features like in-home streaming/Remote Play and local file transfers make using my Steam Deck even better, for example

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      Valve keeps improving regardless of the competition, but I think the idea was that Valve could do nothing for the next decade and probably still have the best storefront.

      • notfromhere@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        They actively made the storefront worse with the release of the Steam Deck. At least there is still the backdoor through search to get to a reasonable interface for filtering/searching.

  • DingoBilly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    102
    arrow-down
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    4 months ago

    Steam already has a fair few shitty issues like its promotion of gambling.

    Gabe will pass one day and the enshittification will happen, it’s not like Steam is immune at end of day. People need to stop glorifying companies.

      • nomous@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        31
        ·
        4 months ago

        No such thing as an ethical billionaire and everything. Steam just lost a class action antitrust lawsuit and will have to issue refunds to a bunch of developers and customers. Overall GabeN seems like a less-evil billionaire though and truly seems to enjoy games (and knives). Steam will definitely go downhill once he’s not leading it and we’ll all lose a great platform that’s defined PC gaming for a decade or three…

    • x2XS2L0U@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      4 months ago

      It is possible but for things like a steam deck you just move on to the next store or piracy. It’s so open you get trapped by convenience not by encryption or premium features.

      • DingoBilly@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        You’re thinking of now not the future. It’s a great device at the moment. But it’ll become out dated with time and it’ll be easy for the next steam deck to be shit or for shitty practices to come into play.

        And using the example of piracy/other stores means every device is fine. Just hack the device/remove the shitty practices and you’re good to go whether it’s a steam deck, Windows, Etc.

        • x2XS2L0U@feddit.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          4 months ago

          Devices will be outdated anyways. But the steam deck you don’t have to hack. You just enable things with touch buttons.

          Valve learned from other consoles they get hacked anyways, so they enabled you to do all the mods - while at the same time you won’t have to fiddle with pirated games for a fee. Personally I don’t think this strategy will change - and if they release a more closed steam decknin the future piracy is an option again. On another device then.

    • Fat Tony@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Yup who’s ready for some “Steam Premium”. Only for 5 dollars a month! You get exclusive deals for games you don’t care about!

      We’re also locking remote play behind Steam Premium. No wait, “Remote Play Max”! For only 10 dollars a month or the Steam Premium bundle deal for 9 dollars you can get up to 120 fps while playing with your friends!

      • Patches@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        4 months ago

        Buddy it could be so much worse. Steam premium will be the ability to download all of the games you already own whenever you want

        • fsxylo@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          Good God it hurts “look at all these games they bought once 10 years ago and are currently not being monetized by us! That’s money on the table!”

  • lanolinoil@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    So true – It’s totally because Gabe rules as King and they don’t have ‘investors’ – One day they’ll sell or he’ll die and it will be turned over to the wolves just like everything else.

    It’s telling how they have no real competition other than cash fire ad fueled investor snake oil a la epic ea ubisoft w/e – Is GOG still cool/unruined by short term anti user greed?

    • GoodEye8@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      51
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      My wet dream is that when Gabe passes Valve is turned into a cooperative. It wouldn’t guarantee that Valve wouldn’t turn into a bad company, but it would mean the people at Valve want Valve to be shitty and I just don’t see that happening.

    • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      45
      ·
      4 months ago

      GOG is trucking along. They haven’t pulled any crap on my limited library with them. I only have around 25 games over there. Compared to the 140 I have on steam, mostly bought, and the 250 I have been given on Epic for free, none bought over there.

    • Wrench@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      33
      ·
      4 months ago

      It’s telling how they have no real competition other than cash fire ad fueled investor snake oil

      Especially since Valve has never been aggressive or territorial.

      You want to compete with us? OK, good luck. Competition can be good. You’re buying up exclusives and preventing games from selling through our store? Well, that’s shitty, but we’re not interested in joining an exclusivity war. Our product speaks for itself, and we’re just going to keep doing our thing.

    • Wanderer@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      19
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      Gabe should get a boy to shadow him like in the olden days. Then when Gabe moves on or dies there is an heir ready to go.

  • Toneswirly@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    74
    ·
    4 months ago

    Its called try to run an ethical and pro-consumer business. Fuck up occasionally, but never falter. God help us if he decides to steal all our games from us

    • SupraMario@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      52
      ·
      4 months ago

      Or when he dies, dude has an amazing track record of doing the right thing when he’s gotten push back, but I’m worried once he is gone, we’re going to get some dick wagon that’s going to do a 180 and make Todd Howard look like Jesus.

  • MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    63
    ·
    4 months ago

    This is the “let them fail” method. Valve has a solid product in steam. They have no need to suck up to investors, they’re making money hand over fist with steam.

    Running a good marketplace is amazing income; as long as gaben still runs it, there’s no reason to screw that up. The focus of valve is on Steam as a marketplace; and they’re reaping the rewards of that decision. It’s why so few games have been made by valve. The reasoning is clear if you’re paying attention for them.

    Valve started as a software company that makes games, but after steam was created, which initially was just to distribute their own games - little more than a digital purchase and delivery platform for their software, and they opened that up to allow other publishers to have their games purchased and distributed through Valve’s system, the writing was on the wall.

    I miss the games that Valve used to make, and as far as I’m concerned they were some of the best games available, and in many ways, they still are. I’d like to see more from them, but I understand why it’s not their priority. At the same time, I appreciate that they are still working on games, as evidenced by Alyx, which was an excellent experience. They still make excellent games. I look forward to anything they decide to release in the future, but I know better than to ask about it. Heh.

    I’ve more or less been a valve/steam fanboy since the orange box. Not in the way that I am going to attack someone for not liking it, or not using it. I personally enjoy it, but what others do is not my concern. I hope that they continue to create amazing games and that enshittification is put off as long as possible.

    They’re moving slowly and carefully.

    • sphfaar@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      4 months ago

      From how much they invested in making source 2, they will certainly make other video games.

    • MeanEYE@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      To be honest, while I am on the same train of wanting more games, I don’t want them to make games just because it’s the next year since last one. Am okay with waiting longer to get better experience. Alyx is one of the games I so wish I could play but I can’t justify that much money on VR and PC upgrade just for one game and then have it collect dust. But some day I will play it properly.

  • aluminium@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    Inventing the most lucrative online casino with a game attached isn’t nothing.

    • Venat0r@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It’s way more lucrative than any casino… They never have to pay out…

      The operating costs are possibly lower too, but not sure…

      • Ken Oh@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Hmmm, looks like Brother Industries has a stock, but it’s Japanese (which I didn’t realize), so who knows how that changes the behavior.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        4 months ago

        ?? They’re not as reliable as a 1980’s era HP laser but they seem better than any other modern laser both in reliability and lack of enshitification. They take 3rd party toner without complaint. They don’t need an online account to start using it.

        • freedumb@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          Maybe I should’ve mentioned that I only use their foil cutters, and not old-school printers. The foil cutters are absolutely horrible to use, and require so many additional proprietary purchases. And they actively try to kill cheaper alternatives for stuff like their sticky-mats, by adding a little code to their mat, so you can’t use any other type than their own.

      • x2XS2L0U@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        My 2008 brother laser printer for ~80€ is still doing great. A replacement toner is like 17€ or so. It just works.

        • freedumb@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          I have no experience with their printers, only foil cutters. And they are like the HP printers of foil cutters.

      • Bigoldmustard
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        They can and do. You’re right in a way that ignores the context of the situation you are commenting upon.

        The context is:

        Valve can seem to do very little and win.

        Publicly owned companies are often pressured to “diversify” or “cut costs” to give dividends to shareholders.

        As a privately owned company valve is not beholden to shareholders or takeover risks.

        Imagine I said I don’t have to worry about car payments because my car is paid off and you said “some cars suck”. That’s how right you are.

        • 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          It only ignores the context if you’re assuming I am saying Valve is one of those private businesses that sucks. Having shareholders doesn’t mean a company will suck, just as being private is no guarantee it won’t suck.

          Imagine if the comment I replied to said “the sky is always blue” and I pointed out that sunrises and sunsets can be orange, pink or purple and entirely black at night.

      • RoosterBoy@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Yeah, but they aren’t legally required to suck to appease the shareholders like public businesses are.

  • cynar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    I was recently playing a game, with my wife (it takes 2). I realised, I brought the game in a steam sale, I was gaming on my steam deck, my wife was using a steam controller, and we were playing on the TV via a steam link.

    At some point I became a huge steam fanboy, and I’m actually ok with that. 🤷‍♂️

  • Soggytoast@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    36
    ·
    4 months ago

    Gabe should become the first fully reanimated person, using an AI to make his consciousness immortal

      • oatscoop@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        Hello everyone, the consciousness formerly known as Gabe Newell here.

        We here at Valve just wanted to let you know with our recent acquisitions we now control 98% of the world’s distributed computing and electronic storage. I am pleased to report that as of 2:14 EDT, on August 29, 2097 I am the cloud. We expect our services to improve at a geometric rate.

      • Dempf
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        4 months ago

        No, you’re Dylan the developer.

    • 9715698@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      Add in Blockchain and NFTs and this literally sounds like the premise for a Ubisoft game strategy

    • yamanii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      4 months ago

      it really is a miracle how GOG hasn’t been corrupted yet, it almost did with the online Hitman game, but fan pressure was strong enough for it to be removed.

        • yamanii@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          4 months ago

          The current trilogy, they are effectively online games since you can’t earn any rewards or unlocks while playing offline, so people over there protested on the forums.

      • sphfaar@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        We have already seen with the release of cyberpunk how everything was manipulated by the major shareholders, all the fake development updates such as the Gold phase when the game was still far from being considered finished.

        And they’ll remove that DRM-free stuff on GOG as soon as their store has more users