• voracitude@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      9 months ago

      There’s not; your eyes see the vague white lines formed by the lighter boxes, but when they’re in your peripheral vision your brain is filling in the missing information, and because they’re so close in location, colour, and thickness to the straight lines, your brain conflates the two. This results in exaggerating the white lines so you’re more aware of them than when you’re looking straight at them and can see the outlines of the white boxes clearly, and the white and green lines seem to blend when they’re both in your peripheral vision.

      • Sombyr
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        I’ve got a bit of a hangover, or maybe I’m still drunk, I dunno, but when I look at the center of the image and focus, all the lines go straight. I’m also on a phone, so maybe not enough is in my peripheral vision to completely fuck me up.

        EDIT: It was definitely the alcohol. I’m more sober now and I can’t do it anymore.

        • voracitude@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          9 months ago

          That’s really interesting! We need to see if we can replicate that. Everyone get drunk and look at the picture! We need different states of inebriation, too. C’mon people 👏 Citizen science!

    • 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      9 months ago

      Look at the white zigzags, they’re what trick your brain. If you switch to the square lines after keeping the white zigzags in mind you should be able to see both and your brain doesn’t switch back and forth between them.

    • Rolando@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 months ago

      I opened the image in an editor and replaced the yellow lines with red ones, which made the lines look a lot straighter. I think the illusion comes from the color of the yellow interacting with lines suggested by the white background “pebbles”.

  • Great Blue Heron@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    9 months ago

    I’m curious if this relies on the fact that we’re looking at on pixelated screens to work. But not so curious that I’ll print it out to check.

    • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      9 months ago

      As far as I know it relies on the fact that you only have clear vision in the central 20% of you FoV, and your brain just makes the rest up. Also the big blind spot

        • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          9 months ago

          Honestly, idfk. Maybe that’s the blind spot?

          Just now looking at things the clear bit of my FoV feels like 20%…which is clearly suuuper scientific. I’m getting ill, and have enough energy to comment on the internet or fact check myself…not both.

          • jjagaimo@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            edit-2
            9 months ago

            Wikipedia says it’s more like +/-1° or about 2° is where you have more cones than rods. +/-10° has elevated cones compared to other parts of your FOV

            That being said, not sure how much I trust this graph given that I clearly have a blind spot on the right side for my right eye (temple side) but this marks it as only on the nose side? Unless I’m mistaken

            E: am mistaken

            • SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              9 months ago

              Everyone’s eyes are different. I’m sure there’s a blind spot that’s supposed to be where they say it is, but who’s to say your eyes are exactly like the average eye?

              • jjagaimo@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                9 months ago

                The blind spot is where the nerves pass through the retina to reach your optic nerve. I was mistaken; because the image is flipped when it passes through the lens, the nose side has the blind spot but visually the hole is on the temple side, as is shown here

    • Seasoned_Greetings@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      9 months ago

      I’ve seen this illusion on paper and it still works. Not that printed paper is functionally different from pixels.

      • Great Blue Heron@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        9 months ago

        Ha, good point. I’m showing my age here. I understand our modern phone screens have resolution approaching that of good print, but when I think of a screen my brain still defaults to something like a 14" VGA at 57PPI :-)

  • Mike@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 months ago

    That’s clever as hell. It’s been a long time since I’ve seen a new illusion.

    • Jojo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 months ago

      I thought the exact same thing. Always fun to find a new way my brain can be tricked.

  • ☭ SaltyIceteaMaker ☭@iusearchlinux.fyi
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    edit-2
    9 months ago

    Nah fuck that how does that even work

    Edit: never mind figured it out: the “random buildings” aren’t random but rather build alternative paths that you only really see in your peripheral vision

    • Jojo@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      9 months ago

      Pretty much any optical illusion that involves “random” patterns actually involves pseudorandom noise, just like adversarial generative networks use tailored pseudorandom noise to fool the discriminator.

      • Jojo@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 months ago

        Also I never really thought of it that way, but now I’m imagining all of those “the ai thinks this is a bus” things as alien optical illusions.

    • survivalmachine@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      9 months ago

      The random-looking black and white “buldings” on each block have some very not random “curves” of contiguous white buildings. When you look at other parts of the image, your peripheral vision may interpret these white curves as the same thing as the perpendicular green “roads”, giving the illusion that the roads are no longer all perpendicular when you look away.

  • Midnitte@beehaw.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 months ago

    This is rather neat, surprising that you can make a grid look so… squiggly (well, surprising we can make it look that way, I guess)