Tukma@lemmy.cafe to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agoIsrael Gaza: China condemns US veto of call for immediate ceasefire at UN - BBCwww.bbc.comexternal-linkmessage-square20fedilinkarrow-up1155arrow-down114cross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
arrow-up1141arrow-down1external-linkIsrael Gaza: China condemns US veto of call for immediate ceasefire at UN - BBCwww.bbc.comTukma@lemmy.cafe to News@lemmy.worldEnglish · 10 months agomessage-square20fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected][email protected][email protected]
minus-squareRapidcreek@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down18·10 months agoSo just because there is no logic for a ceasefire not to address hostages, therefore whoever points that out must be sympathetic to killing? Sorry, that makes no sense
minus-squaremmcintyre@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up19arrow-down2·10 months agoYou say it makes no sense to stop murdering Palestinian children unless Hamas releases hostages. Like, shooting children is a no-brainer. What makes you or Netanyahu any better than Hamas? Literally nothing.
minus-squareRapidcreek@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3arrow-down17·10 months agoNo, I said there was no logic to calling for a ceasefire without addressing hostages.
minus-squareEldritch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up12arrow-down2·10 months agoIt makes lots of sense. With a ceasefire Israel will stop shooting and blowing up their own hostages to be rescued.
minus-squareRapidcreek@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2arrow-down14·10 months agoThat is not logical, that is your own fantasy.
minus-squareEldritch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up11arrow-down1·10 months agoReuter’s is my personal fantasy? Wow okay zionist.
minus-squareRapidcreek@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up1arrow-down10·10 months agoAt least I knew the word zionist before October 7th and know what it means. It’s not really a pejorative.
minus-squareEldritch@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down2·10 months agoYou act like you were the only one. But then again, that’s not the only thing you’re wrong about.
So just because there is no logic for a ceasefire not to address hostages, therefore whoever points that out must be sympathetic to killing? Sorry, that makes no sense
You say it makes no sense to stop murdering Palestinian children unless Hamas releases hostages. Like, shooting children is a no-brainer.
What makes you or Netanyahu any better than Hamas?
Literally nothing.
No, I said there was no logic to calling for a ceasefire without addressing hostages.
It makes lots of sense. With a ceasefire Israel will stop shooting and blowing up their own hostages to be rescued.
That is not logical, that is your own fantasy.
Reuter’s is my personal fantasy? Wow okay zionist.
At least I knew the word zionist before October 7th and know what it means. It’s not really a pejorative.
You act like you were the only one. But then again, that’s not the only thing you’re wrong about.