Reminder: This post is from the Community Actual Discussion. You’re encouraged to use voting for elevating constructive, or lowering unproductive, posts and comments here. When disagreeing, replies detailing your views are appreciated. For other rules, please see this pinned thread. Thanks!

This week’s Weekly discussion thread will be focused on Capitalism / Economic Systems. Here is the definition we will be using so everyone can use the same terminology. If your argument does not use that definition, we ask that you reframe so that it does so that everyone can work within the same framework.

Here are some questions that should help kickstart things:

  • Is capitalism effective? Is it good, or as evil as some Lemmy instances will have you believe?
  • Are there better alternatives, and why are they better?
  • How could we realistically move toward those alternatives?
  • Is there anything you do not understand or would like to discuss about Capitalism / Economic Systems?
  • quindraco@lemm.eeEnglish
    1·
    9 months ago

    Presumably:

    1. The CEO is an employee.
    2. The CEO can’t be the only one owning shares, as all employees must own at least a fraction of a share.
    3. When someone leaves their job, whether quitting or being fired, they must give up their shares.
    4. Employees don’t sell shares, as shares are not bought or sold under this regime.