• maynarkh@feddit.nl
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    4 months ago

    NATO is a defensive alliance. If France went to Ukraine, other members wouldn’t have to follow, only if it spills back into NATO territory and the corresponding member state requests aid.

    It’s the same thing as when not many nations followed the Yanks on their Middle Eastern adventures.

    • Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      4 months ago

      only if it spills back into NATO territory and the corresponding member state requests aid.

      Which without a shadow of a doubt would happen. That’s what I’m getting at

      It’s the same thing as when not many nations followed the Yanks on their Middle Eastern adventures.

      You mean NONE of the times?

      • maynarkh@feddit.nl
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        4 months ago

        Which without a shadow of a doubt would happen. That’s what I’m getting at

        Not necessarily. Russians attacking Poland in response to a limited French deployment would cross an actual red line, that would force every NATO nation, even Hungary, even the US, to intervene directly.

        It would turn the logic of the war around, with Russia being the country being struck from places they can’t retaliate at.

        You mean NONE of the times?

        I mean they are not obligated to. Look at Yemen. Do you see Finnish and Polish forces there? If NATO was involved, you would.