omgarm@feddit.nl to Formula 1@lemmy.world · 8 months agoChristian Horner cleared of inappropriate behaviourwww.thetimes.co.ukexternal-linkmessage-square30fedilinkarrow-up158arrow-down10cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up158arrow-down1external-linkChristian Horner cleared of inappropriate behaviourwww.thetimes.co.ukomgarm@feddit.nl to Formula 1@lemmy.world · 8 months agomessage-square30fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareTheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up9arrow-down6·8 months agoWell… yeah? If he’s guilty of course most would want him sacked for it
minus-squareGeneralEmergency@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up7arrow-down5·8 months agoSounds like you have some important information about the case. Maybe you should share with the proper authorities.
minus-squareTheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8arrow-down4·edit-28 months ago Well… yeah? If he’s guilty of course most would want him sacked for it Added emphasis because clearly you missed that very important word. If he’s guilty. If. I never claimed to have any insider knowledge at all, that’s just a strawman you made up to get angry at. Am I to assume if he’s guilty you wouldn’t want him sacked? That’s kinda fucked up.
minus-squareTheGrandNagus@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3arrow-down3·edit-28 months agoCan you confirm, do you know what ‘if’ means? Yes, no? E: that’s a no then. And being against people being sacked in the event of them being found guilty of sexually harassing employees? Yikes.
Well… yeah? If he’s guilty of course most would want him sacked for it
Sounds like you have some important information about the case. Maybe you should share with the proper authorities.
Added emphasis because clearly you missed that very important word.
If he’s guilty. If. I never claimed to have any insider knowledge at all, that’s just a strawman you made up to get angry at.
Am I to assume if he’s guilty you wouldn’t want him sacked? That’s kinda fucked up.
Can you confirm, do you know what ‘if’ means? Yes, no?
E: that’s a no then.
And being against people being sacked in the event of them being found guilty of sexually harassing employees? Yikes.