• grue@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      9 months ago

      No, Trekkies really were the primary reason. The government had every intention of naming it Constitution until the letter-writing campaign changed officials’ minds. Hell, Roddenberry and the cast of TOS were even invited to the dedication because of it:

      Sources (from the Wikipedia Space Shuttle article):

      https://news.google.com/newspapers?id=JGIgAAAAIBAJ&pg=2595,1284578

      https://gizmodo.com/declassified-memos-reveal-debate-over-naming-the-shuttl-1603073259

      • IninewCrow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 months ago

        A famous event that brought the cast together … Except for William Shatner … who at the time was trying to build a Hollywood leading man persona and distancing himself from the Star Trek franchise because he thought he was the star, not the show.

        He must have regretted not being part of that NASA event.

      • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        9 months ago

        It seems to me “Enterprise” is an excellent name for the space shuttle.

        It would be personally gratifying to several million followers of the television show “Star Trek”, one of the most dedicated constituencies in the country.

        Moreover, the name “Enterprise” is a hallowed Navy tradition. An “Enterprise” was in action against the Barbary pirates in 1803. During World War II, an “Enterprise” served with the Wasp and the Hornet in the carrier fleet in the Pacific. And the Navy’s current “Enterprise” is the first nuclear carrier."

        I don’t know a lot about Star Trek…

        But I’m pretty sure their Enterprise was named that because it was a real name that was frequently re-used.

        Star Trek wasn’t the primary reason, it was a “bonus”.

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          12
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          I never said it was the only reason. I said it was the primary reason – the important one that made the difference. And it was. That’s a fact, whether you like it or not.

          • Aniki 🌱🌿@lemm.ee
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            7
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            9 months ago

            I love that you have pictures and yet people are still clamoring over themselves to AcTuAlLy the conversation.

          • givesomefucks@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            7
            ·
            9 months ago

            You tried to prove it was a fact…

            By posting sources that literally show it wasn’t the primary reason

            If you don’t understand after reading your own links, no about of explaining is going to help.

        • BakerBagel@midwest.social
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          9 months ago

          If Star Wars fans had written in to have it named Millennium Falcon , NASA would have ignored them because the name does not fit conventional naming practices. They were willing to rename it Enterprise because there is a strong/proid history of USN ships named Enterprise. These two facts are not mutually exclusive