• Possibly linux
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    4 months ago

    The only time it does make sense is on minimal systems like routers

    • rmicielski@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      because we all know that routers have so much RAM that installing DNS, NTP, mounts, session, log management isn’t a problem? something doesn’t add up…

      • TCB13@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        edit-2
        4 months ago

        I believe @[email protected] 's point was that in OpenWRT and others it makes more sense to have smaller daemons instead of systemd because they aren’t using the standard ones you’ll usually find under Debian and other Linux distros. They take daemons and slim them down to the point they become smaller than systemd at the cost of features that aren’t required on routers.

        • Possibly linux
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          4 months ago

          Exactly, although it applies to more systems other than OpenWRT

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        Routers lack storage and RAM both of which are used up by using a heavier init. Most of the time you will see a very basic system start services by putting them in init.d

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            4 months ago

            Mine has 128mb of ram. What on earth are you running on your router than needs that much hardware. I just bought a device from Walmart