• redballooon@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    28
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    Mac OS. People say it costs more, but I am not paying for a hardware and then some software that tries to make use of it. Instead I’m paying for a well thought out product that just works.

    • DJDarren@beehaw.org
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      1 year ago

      that (mostly) just works.

      FTFY

      As a Mac user since 2007 it feels like that statement gets a little less true every couple of years. But for me it’s still light years ahead of Windows when it comes to my workflow.

    • GadgetGirlOz@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      1 year ago

      And even though it does cost more at first, it lasts a lot longer and gets lots more free OS updates that most other ones.

      • coffinwood@feddit.de
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        1 year ago

        More free OS updates? You can upgrade your PC from Windows 7 to 10 for free (even to 11 if you have TPM2). That will be decades of free updates and upgrades.

        Not to mention Linux, FreeBSD, and the like.

        • redballooon@lemm.ee
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          11
          ·
          1 year ago

          True, in that order. Win 7, then 10, which almost doesn’t run because of hardware requirements, then all those Linux distros. You will be busy with installing and configuring these for decades, because it mostly doesn’t just work.

          But it’s free, if you value your time to nothing.

      • doggle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 year ago

        The os updates thing may hold more water for iOS… It’s a bit suspect when comparing to Windows and just plain wrong if you compare to any major Linux distro.