• LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 year ago

      Unfortunately, that user is not lying.

      On top of everything else, Vaush engages in ableist, racist, transphobic, and sexist language, unapologetically.

      He’s a genuine piece of excrement

        • LinkOpensChest.wav@lemmy.one
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 year ago

          It’s pretty well known and easy to verify, but I have no interest in googling this reprehensible being. If you’ve listened to him in the past, then I do wish you a swift recovery. Cheers.

        • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          I just don’t trust people (like the person above) who […] casually go “I think they’re a pedophile”

          Oof, dude you make me feel bad for giving you a good faithed response after your first comment.

          For someone who urges to be careful with accusations you are pretty grossly misrepresenting my comment here

          non-ironically throw around terms like “radlib”

          I don’t throw it around like Vaush throws around “red-fascist”, “tankie”, “antisemite” and every other slur , I use it specifically for someone who draws upon radical aesthetic in the abstract but supports the capitalist, imperialist status-quo in the specific.

          You can chose to be offended by that, but Vaush is the definition of a radlib

          Honestly I have only ever used it for him. Thinking of it I might use “Vaushite” in the future which has the added benefit of visually representing the fact that his disingenious output is nothing but a thin layer around “shit”

            • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              edit-2
              1 year ago

              I understand getting tripped up when others chime in with varying intentions. Also my initial comment should have been clearer and did leave more room to read a pedophilia accusation into it than I intended.

              I can see that you argue in good faith and I apologize for some reddit impulses that I haven’t unlearned yet.

              Personally I don’t see the equation of leftism with defending CP in OPs post though.

              The way I read it OP groups “meat-eaters” into categories with each being a drastic exaggeration (the “lvl 5 bloodmouth” is a straight up cannibal) so I think none of this can be taken seriously.

              One “group” is the The “Leftist” meat eater. I expand the quotes to something like The pseudo-leftist meat eater who is then represented by Vaush. To me this is basically a 1 person group that might as well just be called “Vaush” but calling him The pseudo Leftist is just one more swing at him.

              I am definitely both a leftist and not a vegan (someday maybe) and I don’t mind the post in fact I found it quite funny (but obviously very few ppl agree). I agree though that slapping the CP stuff under Vaushs pic is unfair to him, as some people will take it seriously, I have to say that humor was also not lost on me though

              • hoodatninja@kbin.social
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                edit-2
                1 year ago

                I can see that you argue in good faith and I apologize for some reddit impulses that I haven’t unlearned yet.

                You and me both man. Someone the other day said “that classic reddit performative snark” and fuck me if it didn’t feel like I heard a gunshot. Looking through this thread I came pretty close to going full tilt that direction again. Still learning I suppose.

                Personally I don’t see the equation of leftism with defending CP in OPs post though.

                So I’m a little surprised to see this. The image explicitly says:

                THE “LEFTIST”
                No ethical consumption under capitalism. Legalize child porn NOW!" (bolding my own)

                So the post to me is saying “leftists want to legalize child porn.” With Vaush as a poster for all leftists. I do not see it as purely about Vaush anymore than i see the “Plants Rights Activist” commentary being about solely Joe Rogan (which funny enough is not even a stance I think he holds, but I dislike him and don’t care to confirm lol).

                Let me give another example: If I was making a meme and put “Conservatives [insert picture of George Bush above it]: Wants their steak bloody. Hates gay people.” Would you say “ah this is just about George Bush” or would you see it as I see it, which is a statement about ALL conservatives with simply an image of one?

                The images are just meant to accent the content, not be taken directly as the subject. Does that make sense?

    • psilocybin@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      I guess I should have made it more clear, that I was only trying to summarize sentiment about Vaush for you to understand the reference, I was not making anything up

      To be clear: I do not remember nor care what exactly Vaush argued for in that video people point to as I have no interest in wasting more time with Vaush. Personally I don’t believe he would defend pedophilia and just wants to be edgy.

      When I said “It is said” I meant it to be understood like “people say that about him” not that it were common knowledge. I apologize if my English was not on point.

      I think your accusation towards me making something up isn’t fair but I agree with your notion of being careful with the topic in general so I will edit my original comment to reflect that I can’t and won’t weigh in on the debate on whether he did or did not defend pedophilia.

      • hoodatninja@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        1 year ago

        That’s fair. I did come in a little hot, but I am just very tired of watching people casually throw around “pedophile.“ I understand that is not what you were doing, but this post set up a very specific situation that it looked like you were building on. I over interpreted your intention, and I apologize. Still, this post is total rage bait, and kind of messed up ultimately. It’s arguably the weirdest shoehorn trying to equate liberals with pedophiles that I have seen.