• Simulation6@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    1 year ago

    Where does tRump come up with these people? I guess if you have nothing to work with, you still have to come up with some sort of defense.

  • gmtom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    1 year ago

    I wonder how Trumps base would react if a democrat said that violating the constitution was not a criminal act. Specifically if they said it about violating the first or second amendment

  • Bizarroland@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    1 year ago

    One thing that the Chinese Han dynasty had right and that I think that we should bring back is that when people were found to be abject failures to society they would be expected to kill themselves as an apology.

  • kingthrillgore@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 year ago

    Without a Constitution, there is no law. Those who violate it should be tried like any other criminal, instead of asking Congress to do it.

  • Jordan Lund@lemmy.one
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    This guy is going to get destroyed by federal prosecutors, and he will try to blame it all on them.

  • athos77@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    1 year ago

    I like the but where the lawyer says that a jury in DC wouldn’t be diverse enough; I believe they’ve also filed to have the judge replaced. But I have an idea: let’s pursue diversification among trials. We can have Florida case in front of an extremely pro-Trump judge and jury, and we’ll have the DC in front of an anti-Trump one.