• DragonAce@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    111
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    Why are these assholes so against helping people? These fuckers are nothing but greedy sociopaths.

    • bauhaus@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      conservatives view social hierarchy as a necessity which must be enforced. if you’re at the bottom, you deserve to be there, and if you’re there, you suffer because you deserve it, and because you’re at the bottom, you deserve to suffer. cruelty is the point, and without it, there can’t be the joy of their success.

      anything else, to them, is profane and must be fought/destroyed. anyone who tries to climb above their position must be punished.

      relevant videos:

      The Alt-Right Playbook: Always a Bigger Fish

      Endnote 3: The Origins of Conservatism

      • Bizarroland@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        11 months ago

        And many of them got covid bailouts and never had to pay a penny back and do not think even for a moment that their actions are hypocritical

      • cassetti@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        11
        ·
        11 months ago

        I don’t need student debt relief, it won’t affect me. But I am extremely for it - it’s called wanting a better life for your fellow human being.

        Compassion - it’s not a difficult concept if you’re not a narcissistic a$$hole.

        And as an added bonus, the money currently going to banks would actually get better distributed to businesses (both big and small) and act as a net gain to our economy. But screw that - we don’t want some bank stocks to dip and affect some wealthy pension plans! /s

        • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          11 months ago

          I hadn’t ever considered it, but my desire for student debt relief also won’t affect me. I’ve been harping on this thing that I want for the last couple of years. I never stopped for a second to consider that I’m not in that group. I just want a better life for my fellow humans. Thanks for bringing that to my front of mind.

          These people are truly assholes.

    • cassetti@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      11 months ago

      They’ve become so focused on political “points” and afraid of the other “team” scoring a “point” that they’re willing to do anything, regardless of the optics.

      Because they don’t stop and look at the bigger picture - it’s just political capital they can push around or dangle as a carrot in front of voters for future elections.

    • FuglyDuck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because either they got theirs and fuck everyone else. Or, they never got theirs and fuck everyone who might get theirs.

    • Kbin_space_program@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because the corporations that own the private colleges and universities that overcharge on tuition also are the ones that hand out student loans.

      They stand to lose billions of dollars in predatory profit if they can’t collect interest on student loans.

      • tabarnaski@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah I see a lot of “cruelty is the point” comments here, which might not be entirely false, but if they sue it mostly means someone is pissed off about losing revenue.

        • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          The cruelty isn’t the only point behind every conservative position, but it’s the only point of enough of them to make me suspect it’s part of the motivation for all of them.

            • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              11 months ago

              Really? Not for anti-trans laws, anti-immigrant laws, and laws that specifically target medically necessary abortions? Of course it’s the point. If looking at the laws they vote for isn’t good enough, all you have to do is talk to a few conservatives to figure out they’re hateful, cruel people.

              • merc@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                11 months ago

                You may see them as hateful and cruel people, but that’s not how they see themselves. They would have to see themselves as cruel for cruelty to be the point. The fact that you think it’s the point means that you’re unwilling or unable to actually understand their point of view.

                You may disagree with it, but it’s not about “cruelty”, and pretending it is just shows your personal limitations.

                • lolcatnip@reddthat.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  0
                  ·
                  11 months ago

                  If course they don’t see themselves as hateful. But they have no qualms about using cruelty to enforce their idea of the proper social order. If you want to be very literal, the cruelty is the means to an end and not an end in itself, but when they use cruelty as a first resort to enforce rules to designed to keep undesirable people in their place, I see it as a distinction without a difference.

    • LEDZeppelin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 months ago

      Because Ronnie RayGun said it is dangerous for government to help people. Totally cool for government to help those poor billionaires though.

      • some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Totally cool for government to help those poor billionaires though.

        Well, Elorn bought Twatter and can’t afford to pay rent (or severance, or server fees, or lawyers), so it seems right that he should get a handout. How’s the guy even gonna pay for his next lunch?!

        Meanwhile, my grandmother can’t afford insulin. That bitch better figure it out!

    • Vlhacs@reddthat.com
      cake
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      Simple answer I think is GOP don’t want anyone in their base to think any form of government assistance is good and will always label it as hand outs. More government assistance/social safety nets means their capitalist overlords gets to maintain and build their control over citizens and money will flow to them instead. Also “liberals bad!”

    • IchNichtenLichten@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      11 months ago

      Wilholt’s law, “Conservatism consists of exactly one proposition, to wit: There must be in-groups whom the law protects but does not bind, alongside out-groups whom the law binds but does not protect.”

      Aka, “you’re not hurting the right people”

      • Blackmist@feddit.uk
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        “The modern conservative is engaged in one of man’s oldest exercises in moral philosophy; that is, the search for a superior moral justification for selfishness.”

        ― John Kenneth Galbraith

    • HerrBeter@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      15
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 months ago

      The student loan interest rates are exuberant, while I support the nullification of times past, I’d also like to see the core issue being taken care of

      • HappyHam@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Here’s one thing I don’t understand: does loan cancellation consist of the government paying off the loan, or is it a legal nullification of somebody’s loan? If it’s the former, I get economic concerns. If it’s the latter, then I really don’t see arguments against loan cancellation as very credible.

        • moody@lemmings.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          11 months ago

          It’s cancellation of the loans. They’re government loans being forgiven, not private loans paid back by the government.

      • MrSqueezles@lemm.ee
        cake
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        11 months ago

        Yeah, I’d like to focus on stopping the bleeding before mopping up blood. I don’t know what the message is here for future generations.

  • ScrollinMyDayAway@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    11 months ago

    Trillion dollar budget for the military industrial complex? Money well spent! A single dime spent to help taxpayers? Socialism!

    • PsychedSy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      11 months ago

      The majority of the federal budget goes to welfare and entitlements. I’m on the “no standing army” side of things, but it doesn’t help to propagate incorrect information.

      Edit: this is absurd. There’s no opinion here: the comment I replied to is factually wrong. You can’t dislike facts until they’re not true.

      • Alien Nathan Edward@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        11 months ago

        you failed to engage with their actual argument, which was that military spending is absurdly high but always univocally supported by everyone in the establishment and increased with every new budget, but that it’s an uphill fight to get anything new for people who actually need help.

        • PsychedSy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 months ago

          To be fair, I engaged with that portion by pointing out I don’t actually believe in standing armies. So defense spending should be close to zero. But, yeah, everyone wants their pork and defense spending is free money to them.

          • madcaesar@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            11 months ago

            You don’t believe in standing armies? I’m sorry but you’re either 5 years old or incredibly naive.

  • Saneless@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    34
    ·
    edit-2
    11 months ago

    Sounds good, I’ll keep voting for the party that hates US citizens

    -Fucking dipshits who think they’re doing anything other than volunteer work for billionaires

  • ZzyzxRoad@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    11 months ago

    So where are all of the conservative “if Biden actually wanted to cancel student loan debt he would just do it” people now

  • skellener@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 months ago

    How many of these conservatives tried to cancel the Trump and Bush tax cuts for the wealthy? Fuck conservatives!!

    • andrew@lemmy.stuart.fun
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      ·
      11 months ago

      Well right because those clearly trickle down as you can see by the constant record-breaking wealth inequality.

      • littlecolt@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        11 months ago

        Just one more tax break for the rich bro, trust me bro, it’s gonna work this time bro, it’s gonna trickle down like craaaazy bro, the rich just need one more tax break bro, bro please bro, trust me it’s gonna trickle like huge bro

  • lennybird@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    18
    ·
    11 months ago

    I’m sure that just like overturning Roe this will bode well for Republicans next year lol

  • Moyer1666@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    11 months ago

    We should sue the government because of all the tax cuts for the rich if this is how conservatives feel the need to act

    • keeb420@kbin.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      11 months ago

      i should sue for all the ppp loans that were forgiven. how unfair is that. rich people got loans forgiven yet you or i cannot.

      • MarkC568@kbin.social
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        11 months ago

        Most PPP loans didn’t even save any jobs

        Went directly into the business owners pocket to buy swimming pools, boats & exotic cars.

      • Moyer1666@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        11 months ago

        Using similar logic we should be able to use for that. It’s a load of bullshit. The government is constantly giving money directly to rich people, but God forbid we do the same thing for regular people.

  • Hairyblue@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    Stop voting for Republicans. They don’t want the government helping students and workers. All they have is hating on people who are woke. The Woke are minorities, LGBTQ, and non Christians.

    • o_o@artemis.camp
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      11 months ago

      Not even just Christians, anyone not their brand of “Christianity”, the brand that hates everyone, gets the woke label as well.

  • AutoTL;DR@lemmings.worldB
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    11 months ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    Two conservative groups are asking a federal court to block the Biden administration’s plan to cancel $39 billion in student loans for more than 800,000 borrowers.

    In a lawsuit filed Friday in Michigan, the groups argue that the administration overstepped its power when it announced the forgiveness in July, just weeks after the Supreme Court struck down a broader cancellation plan pushed by President Joe Biden.

    The Education Department called the suit “a desperate attempt from right wing special interests to keep hundreds of thousands of borrowers in debt.”

    It’s part of a wave of legal challenges Republicans have leveled at the Biden administration’s efforts to reduce or eliminate student debt for millions of Americans.

    Under the one-time fix, past periods in forbearance were also counted as progress toward Public Service Loan Forgiveness, a program that offers cancellation after 10 years of payments while working in a government or nonprofit job.

    Biden’s action was illegal, the lawsuit says, because it wasn’t authorized by Congress and didn’t go through a federal rulemaking process that invites public feedback.


    I’m a bot and I’m open source!

  • Bluescluestoothpaste@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    13
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    11 months ago

    They just need to make student loans dischargeable in bankruptcy. High earners who can afford their student loans will be dismissed like any bankruptcy court applicant who makes enough money to pay their debts, and the people who are actually struggling will get relief at the penalty of 7 years very bad credit.
    Bankruptcy works for every other kind of debt, it was written into the Constitution by the founding fathers, and it’s the perfect system designed exactly for problems like the student loan crisis.

  • Someology@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 months ago

    Non profits who want to keep under paying educated employees, suing to reverse PSLF awardees. So scummy it’s painful.