A Nebraska woman allegedly found a lucrative quirk at a gas station pump — double-swipe the rewards card and get free gas!

Unfortunately for her, you can’t do that, prosecutors said. The 45-year-old woman was arrested March 6 and faces felony theft charges accusing her of a crime that cost the gas station nearly $28,000.

Prosecutors say the woman exploited the system over a period of several months. Police learned of the problem in October when the loss-prevention manager at Bosselman Enterprises reported that the company’s Pump & Pantry in Lincoln had been scammed.

  • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    46
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    8 months ago

    No, this isn’t a loophole. She found a way to put the pump into maintence mode and set the price to zero. “The computer let me do it” isn’t much of an excuse. The self checkout at the grocery store lets me tare a steak like it’s bananas, but I’d definitely expect shopplifting charges if I got caught tricking the machine to charge me $0.40/lb for steak so I could fill my bag with steaks. There would be plenty of evidence that what I did was intentional and dishonest.

    She exploited this glitch for $28k worth of gas in just 7 months, presumably for profit. That’s way more gas than a single vehicle would consume in that time.

    This wasn’t a case of just paying what the screen said she owed. This was a case of gaining unauthorized access to the computer and adjusting the price to zero so she could steal at scale.

    • 3volver@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      30
      arrow-down
      4
      ·
      8 months ago

      Yet when 2008 happened they got a bail out and a pat on the back. Trick a machine? Felony theft charge. Trick the American people? Bail out.

      • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        Two things can be true, and you can agree with one and disagree with the other.

        • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          8 months ago

          Very well. Please clear up the misunderstanding and say the words “the bailouts should never have happened and everyone involved in that disaster should have faced felony charges”

          • SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            8 months ago

            The bailouts should never have happened and everyone involved in that disaster should have faced felony charges.

            Now, can you say the words “anyone that steals things of more than $10,000 in value should face felony charges”?

                • afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  arrow-down
                  2
                  ·
                  8 months ago

                  Nope. She broke the law in the sense that all those Wall Street types broke the law with mortgage backed securities.

                  Why are you defending the two tier justice system?

                  • BreakDecks@lemmy.ml
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    2
                    arrow-down
                    1
                    ·
                    8 months ago

                    I’m not, it sounds like we are in agreement that she committed a serious crime. It’s a shame that the Wall Street types get away with it, but you seem fine with that?

    • whoisearth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      She got greedy. Back when a buddy and I administered our SWIFT platform there were a couple of well publicized exploits of the system for millions. We discussed how easy it would be to write a script to randomly skim a fraction of a cent off of transactions over a long period of time, just don’t get greedy. No one cares about rounding errors.

      If this lady stuck to random fillups for free once every couple of months she probably could have flew under the radar for years and more importantly had a better claim to ignorance if caught.

    • Crozekiel
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      8 months ago

      Not “presumably for profit”, definitely for profit. The article mentions one person that paid her $500 for about $700 worth of fuel in that 6 months because she was told it was a discount card. She was literally charging other people for the gas directly. And 7400 gallons of gas in 6 months, that’s well over 100k miles with a low ball estimate for fuel economy. She probably pocketed nearly 20k cash in that time.