If I had more faith in the media, I would say that their “we have to cover both sides of every issue” pathology would work in our favor on this issue
However, I believe that there would magically be no need to cover both sides of every issue in this case, because it was always just a smokescreen to justify airing some bullshit that they can’t justify in any other way. So depending on the media you might be right yes.
If I had more faith in the media, I would say that their “we have to cover both sides of every issue” pathology would work in our favor on this issue
However, I believe that there would magically be no need to cover both sides of every issue in this case, because it was always just a smokescreen to justify airing some bullshit that they can’t justify in any other way. So depending on the media you might be right yes.