ruffsl@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 8 months agoProgramming languages personified - leftoversaladleftoversalad.comexternal-linkmessage-square42fedilinkarrow-up1215arrow-down110cross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1205arrow-down1external-linkProgramming languages personified - leftoversaladleftoversalad.comruffsl@programming.dev to Programmer Humor@programming.devEnglish · 8 months agomessage-square42fedilinkcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up12arrow-down3·edit-28 months agoJS, at least, deserves it.
minus-squaretsonfeir@lemm.eelinkfedilinkarrow-up4arrow-down1·8 months agoHow do you feel about TypeScript
minus-square🇦🇺𝕄𝕦𝕟𝕥𝕖𝕕𝕔𝕣𝕠𝕔𝕕𝕚𝕝𝕖@lemm.eelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up10arrow-down3·8 months agoU can try and polish a turd if ya want.
minus-squareCanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.orglinkfedilinkarrow-up5arrow-down1·edit-28 months agoBetter. Of course, it’s just built over top, so you can still get JavaScript issues in TypeScript, and it’s not necessarily going to be obvious. This is particularly an issue if you call JavaScript libraries, which I’m told is standard practice.
minus-squareMonkderZweite@feddit.chlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·8 months agoA more polished unholy list of depencies?
JS, at least, deserves it.
How do you feel about TypeScript
U can try and polish a turd if ya want.
Well, what TYPE of turd is it? ;)
any
You better catch that.
Better. Of course, it’s just built over top, so you can still get JavaScript issues in TypeScript, and it’s not necessarily going to be obvious. This is particularly an issue if you call JavaScript libraries, which I’m told is standard practice.
A more polished unholy list of depencies?