It’s hard to overstate how important Schneider, 52, was to Nickelodeon — writers have described him as “the Norman Lear of kids television”; “the Aaron Sorkin of tween sitcoms”; and “teen TV’s reigning champ, who can’t seem to touch an idea without turning it into an unwieldy pile of cash for Nick.”
you are wildly downplaying his role and power at nick studios, if you’ve read about this subject at all or watched the documentary he was bringing in a ton of money and held a lot of sway as a result.
I’m not saying he is the reason the logo is a foot but it’s very plausible that he could be the reason.
No I don’t. Those are very different spheres of people to influence. The clout needed to get away with sdx crimes is significantly lower than that required to make network exec level decisions related to promotion and advertising which was not his job. You can be powerful in a company but still not be involved in every decision. It’s senseless conspiratorial thinking. This stuff wasn’t his job.
He was a writer and a showrunner, not a network executive.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/arts-and-entertainment/wp/2018/03/29/the-sudden-end-of-dan-schneiders-time-at-nickelodeon-where-he-built-an-empire/
you are wildly downplaying his role and power at nick studios, if you’ve read about this subject at all or watched the documentary he was bringing in a ton of money and held a lot of sway as a result.
I’m not saying he is the reason the logo is a foot but it’s very plausible that he could be the reason.
Aaron Sorkin doesn’t decide whether NBC has a peacock for a logo
I don’t think the NBC logo changed at the height of Sorkin’s power at NBC did it? Not really an apt comparison
Ok.sure. he changed the logo cause of his fetish. That makes just as much fucking sense.
you know maybe it’s the other way around and mainlining that much capitalism is what got him off, the feet just looked like the logo he craves
I mean if he had enough influence to actually assault all the kids he could influence the temporary corner logo is all I’m saying
No I don’t. Those are very different spheres of people to influence. The clout needed to get away with sdx crimes is significantly lower than that required to make network exec level decisions related to promotion and advertising which was not his job. You can be powerful in a company but still not be involved in every decision. It’s senseless conspiratorial thinking. This stuff wasn’t his job.