• SSJ2Marx@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      25
      ·
      3 months ago

      Back in the Star Wars EU days my mantra was “it’s canon of you want it to be” because the official thing where different sources had different levels of canon created massive unresolved contradictions anyway.

      • JohnBrownNote [comrade/them, des/pair]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 months ago

        canon is just continuity from a more zoomed out perspective, you a gOoD sToRy freaks wouldn’t tolerate that shit in an individual story unless it was deliberately using it as a device, you shouldn’t accept it in worldbuilding.

        • FourteenEyes [he/him]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          3 months ago

          Which could or could not be important to the story in question. Setting continuity is not important in the movie where John Wick shoots 187 people in the face because he’s mad about his dog

          Star Trek is one of my favorite IPs and they took canon out back and shot it in the head on day one

          • JohnBrownNote [comrade/them, des/pair]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            3 months ago

            the dog one is the first story, it literally only could have internal issues.

            but once you have a sequel or second episode it’s always important to the story, because fucking it up undermines everything. You can go full dexter’s lab and reset everything every time, but once you put on the mantle of continuity and ask us to care about events over time then you owe us better than voyager. A “good story” that ignores all the other ones and in turn be ignored by them isn’t actually good.