• mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 months ago

    A functional community would not let infrastructure degrade to that point because it’s not in the interest of the community. This event you’re describing comes from greedy powerful people pushing off needed maintenance to buy a new Mercedes. The community would have systems in place to manage the infrastructure, infrastructure that could not be managed would not be built.

    You’re basically asking “how would anarcho-communists deal with this huge mess made by authoritarian capitalists?”

    • Dozzi92@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 months ago

      Who’s paying for the maintenance? What happens in the event of an “act of God”? What is “the community” you speak of? I don’t know what this has to do with greed. Things cost money. You need to have a structure for how costs are levied amongst homeowners. I don’t get what is so difficult to understand. Would you prefer there just be a bunch of lawsuits when any little thing goes wrong?

      • mojo_raisin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        8 months ago

        If you’re in a city, these things should be taken care of by the city and state. There is no need for an additional micro-state.