• Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 months ago

    I disliked Pulaski because she was written as a Mary Sue.

    Picard needs heart surgery? Pulaski is the best heart surgeon in the galaxy. Virus that ages people? Pulaski wrote the definitive paper on Viruses. Riker’s dad shows up? Oh Pulaski dated him. Geordi has problems with his visor? Pulaski had done several successful ocular implant surgeries.

    It was ridiculous.

    You can get away with giving a character one unique ability. But Federation’s top heart surgeon, virologist, opthalmologist, and dates Riker’s dad is the same person? That’s bad writing.

    • zaphod@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      7 months ago

      LOL you’ve described literally every doctor in Star Trek ever. I mean, Christ, they lampshaded this with McCoy when he exclaimed “By golly, Jim - I’m beginning to think I can cure a rainy day!” when he treated a fucking silicon rock monster.

      Honestly at this point this is just making up reasons to be mad.

      • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        There is a huge difference between the Enterprise Doctor or Engineer overcoming odds and solving the problem and walking in saying, “I’m the Galaxy’s expert in this.” “Oh and I’m also the Galaxy’s expert in this and that too.”

        • zaphod@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          7 months ago

          You’re right. In the former case it’s utterly implausible that every ship doctor would not be an expert in a thing but still somehow be able to cure that thing. Every. Damn. Time.

          At least with Pulaski they gave an excuse (well, assuming I buy your claims; frankly, I think you’re overstating things quite a bit).

          • Blue_Morpho@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            7 months ago

            Not being an expert, having a problem, learning, and overcoming the problem is the narrative circle.

            Walking in as the foremost expert on everything is called a Mary Sue and is correctly derided as bad writing.

            If we had been introduced to Pulaski being a virologist and then in later episodes her expertise is useful, that’s fine, narratively.

            Edited:

            Picard travels to the best heart surgeon in the Federation. Billions of humans. The best out of Billion:

            "PHYSIOLOGIST: You’re unwilling to make the attempt??

            SURGEON: I’m not qualified.

            PHYSIOLOGIST: I know someone who is."

            <Pulaski>

            Best virologists in the Federation (again that means billions of people) doing cutting edge research:

            "KINGSLEY [on viewscreen]: To whom am I speaking, please?

            PULASKI: I’m Doctor Pulaski, Chief Medical Officer.

            KINGSLEY [on viewscreen]: Katherine Pulaski, author of Linear Models of Viral Propagation?"

            It’s hamfisted writing.