• Jajcus@kbin.social
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    6 months ago

    Understood: the debts can get higher now, as the government will pay it…

    I don’t think this is the way to go. Not while getting into medical debt like that is still a possibility.

    • rottingleaf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      10
      ·
      6 months ago

      Yes, that’s how demand works.

      The way to drastically reduce medical expenses and thus debt is deregulating health.

      From what I remember, you need to have quite a lot of things to become a doctor in the USA, even more to run a related business, and most of those are not about education. So the “supply” here is relatively low.

      Also to make education (including medical education, which means - supply again) more affordable the government should just stop subsidizing student loans.

      It may have some fixed sum per student allocated, which may be paid for a place, which can be awarded to students from poorer families or something. The “fixed” and “paid for a whole place” parts are important, otherwise this will work just like subsidizing loans - by inflating prices further.

      • brenstar@midwest.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 months ago

        Ah yes, just what the healthcare industry needs, LESS regulation. That’ll keep those for profit companies from gouging people for the life saving measures they need to not die.

        • rottingleaf
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          6 months ago

          Now they are using regulations so that you wouldn’t have choice.

          • brenstar@midwest.social
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            4
            ·
            6 months ago

            Yes, corporate lobbying is a huge problem here and is often used as a weapon to stifle competition and increase profits. At times it’s hard to remember what regulations are meant to do: Protect People from Corporations

            We don’t need to remove regulations, we need to improve them.

            • rottingleaf
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              6 months ago

              At times it’s hard to remember what regulations are meant to do: Protect People from Corporations

              Historically they were introduced to protect corporations from people. Well, sometimes some collective interests from other collective interests.

              We don’t need to remove regulations, we need to improve them.

              It’s an arms race, and one side has more resources than the other.