• Honytawk
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    7 months ago

    So they cheaped out on what is supposed to be a premium brand, gotcha

    • becausechemistry@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      What percentage of people who buy the least expensive MacBook do you think are going to hook it up to more than two displays? Or should they add more display controllers that won’t ever be used and charge more for them? I feel like either way people who would never buy one will complain on behalf of people who are fine with them.

      • Zangoose@lemmy.one
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        7 months ago

        The least expensive MacBook is still $1000, closer to $1500 if you spec it with reasonable storage/ram. It really isn’t that much of a stretch to add $100-300 for a 1080/1440p monitor or two at a desk.

    • areyouevenreal@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 months ago

      Not necessarily. The base machines aren’t that expensive, and this chip is also used in iPads. They support high resolution HDR output. The higher the number of monitors, resolution, bit depth, and refresh rate the more bandwidth is required for display output and the more complex and expensive the framebuffers are. Another system might support 3 or 4 monitors, but not support 5K output like the MacBooks do. I’ve seen Intel systems that struggled to even do a single 4K 60 FPS until I added another ram stick to make it dual channel. Apple do 5K output. Like sure they might technically support more monitors in theory, but in practice you will run into limitations if those monitors require too much bandwidth.

      Oh yeah and these systems also need to share bandwidth between the framebuffers, CPU, and GPU. It’s no wonder they didn’t put 3 or more very high resolution buffers into the lower end chips which have less bandwidth than the higher end ones. Even if it did work the performance impacts probably aren’t worth it for a small number of users.