• Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    144
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    6 months ago

    There’s a rule banning “self-preferencing.” That’s when platforms push their often inferior, in-house products and hide superior products made by their rivals.

    Spaz isn’t going to like this.

    • stephan@feddit.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      31
      ·
      edit-2
      6 months ago

      He wouldn’t if it applied to him. Unfortunately, reddit is not a gatekeeper in the sense of the DMA and due to its management it’s also unlikely to ever reach that position :)

      • Maple Engineer@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        You’re right. Hopefully they will expand the rules to include non-gatekeeper services like Reddit once the rule is in effect.

    • JasonDJ
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      6 months ago

      Unless the saga continues, they didn’t “hide” the competition, they paywalled their access.

      There’s nothing wrong, per se, with charging access to the API. Where they went wrong was setting an exorbitant price. That was clearly anti-competitive. They knew the pricing they set wouldn’t be sustainable to any third party developers. Then he started shit talking the Apollo developer…

      • purplemonkeymad@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 months ago

        Well it may or may not be wrong. One of the measures would be, can Reddit afford the price if it also had pay for the same access? If the answer is no, then it might be considered preferential treatment to their own app. However ianal so there could be a carve out for that.