cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/15863526

Steven Anderegg allegedly used the Stable Diffusion AI model to generate photos; if convicted, he could face up to 70 years in prison

  • DemigodrickA
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    7 months ago

    Well the American way is not to hold the company accountable, I.e. school shootings, so yeah.

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      7 months ago

      I’m pretty sure you can’t hold a school liable for a school shooting

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            7 months ago

            Still can’t really hold them liable unless they deliberately sold a weapon to someone who legally was prohibited from having a weapon.

            Shooting are more of a mental health and social media issue in my mind. The bigger question is why did someone feel the need to kill others?

            • DemigodrickA
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              7 months ago

              Still can’t really hold them liable unless they deliberately sold a weapon to someone who legally was prohibited from having a weapon.

              That’s a very American point of view though - America isn’t holding those who create/sell tools that do bad things to account. If gun manufacturers were held responsible for how the things they created were used, you can bet anything suddenly they’d be hell of lot safer. Which is the exact same point about AI.

              (Obviously not holding manufacturers/sellers to account is not an America-only issue, but this article is about AI and the USA so that’s the example I’m using.)

              The bigger question is why did someone feel the need to kill others?

              As a non-American, I think the general question is why on earth does the general public need semi-automatic weapons. Or really, any weapons.

              • ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                5
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                7 months ago

                I mean we’re also not suing Toyota or Stolichnaya to stop drunk driving. In America the onus is on you not to do the bad thing, not on the companies or government for not preventing you from doing it. In America if you kill someone it is your fault, not Ruger’s.

                Frankly I’m surprised it doesn’t work that way in every country, if you sell a friend your old car and he hits an old lady years or months later would you get charged? That sucks.

              • Leg@lemmy.world
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                arrow-down
                1
                ·
                7 months ago

                I see the gun issue in America in the same light as the car issue. We’re in way too fucking deep, and it’s a part of our culture now. I hate both, but I acknowledge how difficult it is to do something about it.

                  • Leg@lemmy.world
                    link
                    fedilink
                    English
                    arrow-up
                    1
                    ·
                    7 months ago

                    Making people do something they don’t wanna do is actually fairly difficult. I personally don’t drive or own a gun, but the people who do either tend to be pretty serious about it.