Demigodrick

Lemmy.zip admin
Contact me via hello@lemmy.zip


  • Elsewhere: me.lemmy.zip - See my accounts across the internet
  • 303 Posts
  • 647 Comments
Joined 2 years ago
cake
Cake day: June 10th, 2023

help-circle







  • DemigodrickOPMAtoHomeIMPORTANT: Proposal to change Lemmy.zip to 18+ only
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    8.54 Following our November 2023 Consultation, Ofcom included proposals on highly effective age assurance (‘HEAA’) in the December 2023 Consultation on our guidance for service providers publishing pornographic content on their online services (‘Part 5 guidance’). Age assurance proposals were also included for U2U services in our May 2024 Consultation. However, our expectations around HEAA will not be finalised at the time we publish these Illegal Content Codes of Practice for U2U services.

    8.55 Therefore, rather than delay the introduction of the safety defaults measure, we proposed in our November 2023 Consultation that we should initially introduce the measure with a stipulation that services should only be in scope if they have an existing means of identifying child users, whether that is a form of age assurance or another method.

    The HEAA guidance isn’t yet published, and neither is the risk assessment documentation, so we don’t actually know what type of category we’ll fall in to yet to even make the decision LFGSS made. Admittedly they are a magnitude larger than lemmy.zip and probably fall higher up the risk assessment than us.

    It also doesn’t apply if there isn’t already an age verification process in place (until the above HEAA guidance is published)



  • DemigodrickOPMAtoHomeIMPORTANT: Proposal to change Lemmy.zip to 18+ only
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Maybe (hopefully!)

    Once the risk assessment is released and I’ve had chance to scour 1000+ pages of guidance, it is possible. It was a thought in the back of my mind, yes. Will have to look at the wording, and USA is still COPPA i believe which is 13+, although I need to do some research how that works regarding NSFW content


  • Yeah, turning off NSFW also kills the ability to have image spoilers, interact with art communities, and work with any community that uses it for things like content warnings instead of adult entertainment. Not something I’d want to do.

    Unfortunately the scope of this law is for any site offering a service to a UK resident (completely unenforceable and written by insane people) and i have the misfortune of living in the UK so it doubly applies to me.

    Suggestions for setting up a company in another country do sound appealing to get around this though, but sounds costly.



  • I don’t disagree that’s it’s not highly effective, but Lemmy doesn’t have any other built in tooling for this and in order to move in the right direction, with the lack of tooling, moving to 18+ only is just a step in the right direction.

    There’s over 1000 pages of guidance, and of ofcom haven’t released their risk assessment yet, so things should be clearer when that is available - for now, I feel it’s important to at least not offer a service to under 18s if we can’t guarantee they don’t look at NSFW content.

    I will also add that their “effective” methods are not reasonable for small independent sites, and the whole act shows a complete disregard for an independent Internet.


  • The problem is we currently provide services to under 18s, with a toggle that allows anyone to view NSFW content. You’re absolutely right, there is no way to verify that currently, but the least I can do is protect the site going forwards by saying you have to be 18 to sign up, because there are no additional checks around age. That would then put us on par with an adult entertainment site at the moment (if/until mandatory age verification is brought in) in terms of someone would have to confirm they are 18 to enter.

    I’m certainly not a lawyer, but that seems to move us away from anyone of any age signing up and me saying I’m fine with it. Until there is a solution in place software wise, it seems easiest to say we don’t provide services to children and they shouldn’t sign up here.


  • Yeah, its insane. They expect this to be done by every website providing services to UK users. The overreach is just mad. And completely unenforceable too.

    I imagine many UK sites will go down that route, especially with how many Mastadon servers there are in the UK. I’d be up for doing that if it was feasible (financially and technically).


  • DemigodrickOPMAtoHomeIMPORTANT: Proposal to change Lemmy.zip to 18+ only
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    17
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    With the current UI there is just check boxes to enable/disable NSFW. Even if you had to explicitly tick a box to say you are 18 before the NSFW box was visible would be a good solution, I think.

    I certainly do not want to turn NSFW off at all though, just highlighting that its an extreme option, and with the current way things work with Lemmy there is no in between.

    I also would absolutely not want to deal with checking people’s IDs, nobody has time for that!



  • Yeah absolutely, it doesn’t stop anyone lying about their age. I’m hoping it’s just enough to say that if someone was to report it to whoever, we can turn around and say “they lied about their age”. We could even do it now, but the enable NSFW buttons have no surrounding text to repeat the age warning (and there’s nothing at all in the profile option!) which is what worries me the most.