Under the envisioned framework, both candidate and issue ads would be required to include an on-air and filed disclosure that AI-generated content was used.

    • rufus@discuss.tchncs.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 month ago

      Agree. Came here to say the same. And it’s not even far from what we’ve been doing in the past. When taking text or pictures from other people, we were/are also forced to mention that because of copyright. We could just do the same for AI generated content.

    • Pronell@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      Or prohibited. Why would this ever be considered in political ads, seriously?

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 month ago

        Why wouldn’t it? I some politician or producer wants to use AI let them. They just should disclose it.

      • Adalast@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        28 days ago

        Because deep fakes aren’t the only thing you can do with AI. There are lots of non-manipulative use cases for AI generation and those should now be excluded. I do believe any AI generation that includes images of people should be excluded.