I would be real disappointed if that was true

Also, why are pronouns bad when we do it?

  • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    113
    ·
    1 year ago

    “Ok guys I just got this great idea for how we can troll the left, it’s really funny I promise, what if we like, what if we all like, set up a community where we pretend to be commies, and also a bunch of us were like, trans and gay and stuff? No no like hear me out we would like ban anyone who says slurs or questions the validity of trans people in any way, lol. Like, what if we designed a bunch of custom emojis with the trans flag and made everyone display pronouns next to the name to make sure nobody gets misgendered? That’d be so funny lol. But we HAVE to make sure nobody catches on, so we should just like, keep the bit to ourselves for a couple years, we’d have to like, spend a couple years hanging out in that kinda space with just us until we can perfect the bit. Ok so who’s down?”

    Seriously, have these people met chuds before? I’d be impressed to see one that could keep the mask on for like a day.

    • GarbageShoot [he/him]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      81
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      Don’t forget having fucking reading groups and forums for learning about leftist theory and history and having many users on hand who can discuss Marxist, etc. works with a great deal of familiarity, often readily including citations and encouraging people to do their own reading.

      This is some “Judeo-Bolshevism” level shit

    • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      56
      ·
      1 year ago

      I don’t think they have met CHUDs. They talk about them, but almost never actually interact with them. So their entire idea about them is concocted in their own heads. That way they don’t risk being challenged by the way the CHUDs use exactly the same arguments as libs.

      • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        48
        ·
        1 year ago

        You might have a point. I guess most of us here are better at understanding what goes on inside the heads of chuds, compared to the average person.

        At the same time, I think a lot of the stuff people say about us are symbolic beliefs that have more to do with the person saying them. For example, I don’t think libs “really” think we’re bots or foreign agents, but denouncing us as such lets them reaffirm their loyalty to the state. And this “secretly right-wing” stuff has the same feel. They believe it the same way people “believed” that Trump was going to make Mexico pay for the wall, they just like the way it feels when it comes out of their mouth.

        • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          43
          ·
          1 year ago

          Exactly right, at least as far as I can tell. Their complaints about us are ultimately immaterial. They’re just “bad things.” we are a collection of “bad things” to them, so they don’t have to listen to us. We make them uncomfortable, because Liberalism doesn’t actually explain anything about the world, but we clearly do have some kind of understanding of things that they lack. That’s threatening to their worldview.

          But if they can put us in the “secretly right wing” box, then all our arguments are just “trickery” trying to trick them, the most important people. So they can feel justified in dismissing us without thought because we’re part of the bad guy team. Cognitive dissonance resolved.

          • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            44
            ·
            1 year ago

            The thing that gets me is how none of these explanations make any sense in the context that we were on our own for three years. No one’s doing an act for three years, especially with nobody to troll. No government is paying foreign agents to talk to each other. And like you said it’s very self-centered, almost to the point of solipsism, like my opinion is so important that people are concocting these elaborate ruses to try and fool me, as opposed to the idea that… people just think differently than you? Just an utter unwillingness to consider that anyone might exist who doesn’t fit neatly into one of the two mainstream American cultural boxes. Social chauvinists tbqh.

            • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              40
              ·
              1 year ago

              It’s really self-serving isn’t it? The liberals on lemmy are just so damn important that you’d fake 3 full years of posts where you “pretend” to be leftists just to try and fool them when you finally ended up federating.

              It’s pure conspiracy theory logic really. The idea that “any evidence against my position is actually just a ruse, regardless of how impossible it would be to actually set that up.” Not to mention how much of a waste it would be, what would it even accomplish? If we convinced some shitlib that the whole system is bullshit, then what happens? They just don’t vote for Biden next election. Business as usual. It changes nothing about the US, except that maybe the representative of the bourgeoisie is an orange clown of an old man instead of just standard white old man.

              • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                32
                ·
                1 year ago

                Yeah and you see a lot of stuff that’s like, in one of the first news threads we were in someone was like, “Just bring up Tiananmen Square, that’ll make 'em go away,” (and get absolutely dogpiled) and today I saw someone post that copypasta with the Chinese characters that’s supposed to dispel Chinese bots or agents, and it’s like, those things never work. They have to know they never work. It really is just an article of faith, it’s clutching your beads and repeating a mantra until the demons leave you alone.

                • DamarcusArt@lemmygrad.ml
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  32
                  ·
                  1 year ago

                  I guess they technically work in a sense. Like yeah, if someone goes:

                  “Tinyman square yogurt genocide checkmate tankies.”

                  Yeah, I’ll probably just leave them alone. They aren’t worth talking to.

                  Though it is the internet debate equivalent of shitting your pants to get everyone else to leave the room. They just don’t understand how they aren’t actually “winning” so much as they are “not worth wasting time interacting with.”

        • JuneFall [none/use name]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          21
          ·
          1 year ago

          Yeah I think a bit of the “secretly right-wing” is about morality. It also is about authority and not really thought out concepts of violence and force. There also is the “intention” and “effect” thing going on with sane-ism. Parenti and Lenin said lots of it well, too.

      • Zuzak [fae/faer, she/her]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        46
        ·
        1 year ago

        Trying to figure out if I can use this irl, like, “No, see, I’m only transitioning to act as a deep cover operative so I can find and expose the grooming rings, can I count on your cooperation in keeping up my disguise by calling me by a different name and pronouns?”

    • Sickos [they/them, it/its]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      1 year ago
      CW: antisemitism

      Even at the peak of the the bizarre frenworld stuff when they tried their damnedest to keep the mask on there’d be a happy merchant or triple parens in every thread

      Also I spend too much time here I started spelling “bullshit” B-O-L-S-H from transcribing my inner monologue.

  • Rom [he/him]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    106
    ·
    edit-2
    1 year ago

    Just like all their other bullshit. They claim we’re right-wing, they claim we aren’t LGBTQ+ accepting, they claim we support Putin, yet no matter how many times we ask, never once have they ever bothered to pony up any evidence to back up these wild accusations.

    • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      78
      ·
      1 year ago

      The issue is that the liberals have figured out you don’t need evidence. You just need more people to repeat a message often enough for it to become the accepted “”“truth”“”. It doesn’t have to be the actual truth but you create it by making people believe it through repetition.

      It’s propaganda, and it works. Nobody is immune to it including us, but the more switched-off to propaganda that people are the more susceptible to it they are. And the vast majority of people are switched off to it.

        • Awoo [she/her]@hexbear.net
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          63
          ·
          edit-2
          1 year ago

          That’s why they defederate us though. They create a chamber in which we don’t exist, and then repeat the propaganda without opposition where people believe it.

          They did the same with historical revisionism, like the ribbentrop pact, and look at how almost every lib repeats that ahistorical shit now.

          Social media pillarisation is about getting communists away from susceptible liberals, so that they don’t become communists and so that communists don’t interfere with their propaganda by injecting the actual truth.

    • CrispyFern [fae/faer, any]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      1 year ago

      I think since federation I’ve only seen a lemmy lib post a source once, and it was a link to wikipedia. They are allergic to providing proof/sources, whether it be a serious political discussion or petty federation drama. I saw a lemmy claim they received transphobic comments from a hexbear. A mod from here replied to them to provide the username so they can be banned. Of course the user “couldn’t remember” the username (can’t you just check your post history?).

      • GnastyGnuts [he/him]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        36
        ·
        1 year ago

        They’re presumably much more used to people just believing the shit they say, and likewise they’re more used to just going along with whatever they hear. Many of us are commies in deeply capitalistic countries and we’re used to people not just going along with what we say, we’re used to them not believing us, expecting sources, we’re used to them trying to find any way they can to dismiss the sources we provide, and so on …

      • JuneFall [none/use name]@hexbear.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        22
        ·
        1 year ago

        In regards to de federation I did half a dozen digs. In those dugs I found 5 people inventing things and one who was telling the truth somewhat correct, but since they didn’t get the vibe they misinterpreted the meaning of it. After that I stopped and took up the concept of: “If someone did something to you then you better link it in the fediverse, else I think you are lying”.

        During the de federation of one instance I found a soldier who insulted for being an US narc. That guy claimed he got deaht threats for correcting people, not for him literally being in the war of aggression organization with genocide and collateral damage as a side dish.

  • RedQuestionAsker2 [he/him, she/her]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    ·
    1 year ago

    So people here are right wingers pretending to be trans and left wing. In order to keep up the charade, we suppress our deeply held right wing urges to hate gay people by banning all homophobia, mandating pronouns, and having explicitly pro-trans comms. And we’ve done all of this completely isolated for years.

    And we have executed this plot in order to…?

  • WhatWouldKarlDo@lemmygrad.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    69
    ·
    1 year ago

    Because even though they can’t find any evidence of right wing ideology on this instance, they know it’s here. Any REAL leftist would support the USA and NATO no matter what. And since rightwingers and tankies hate LGBT people, that must make the pronouns a mockery. It’s sarcasm on top of sarcasm.

    It only makes sense if you start with the conclusion and work backwards.

    • heartheartbreak [fae/faer]@hexbear.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      83
      ·
      edit-2
      1 year ago

      "In fact, we carried, before we had a pride flag, we carried the North Vietnamese flag as our pride flag. Now you could hear that and think “well that’s interesting”, but it wasn’t just an abstract thing.

      (And by the way, I know there’s some people who have to leave at, uh, for a nursing class here; nobody’s gonna look at you funny when you go. I know people are starting to get nervous about—don’t worry, you go with our grace.)

      So, the Gay Liberation Front and the Third World Liberation Front named themselves in solidarity with the North Vietnamese people at a time when that was considered treason. That’s like now, coming out and defending the resistance of the Iraqi people, the Palestinian people, the North Korean people, the Iranian people, the Cuban people. We face getting beaten up on the streets for marching with the Vietnamese flag but we knew that if we didn’t defend the Vietnamese people we were gonna weaken, first of all the people who deserved our support because we were the aircraft carrier in which the war was being launched in all our names. We would lose the solidarity with the Vietnamese people and we would lose our own political souls and movement as well if we didn’t take a position in support.

      We were supporters on the front lines of the women’s liberation movement even when there were some who didn’t want us to be there—who said ooh, if you could just get out of the way, because you know, we’re strong women and they’re calling us lesbians [be]cause you’re around. We’re like, excuse me, we’re withstanding the lesbian invading—you better get used to that. As strong women you better get used to saying “and yes, many of us are!” Because otherwise, you’ll just back yourself right off a cliff. And I would ask you, do we have an equal rights amendment today? It was not a winning strategy.

      We were involved in all these struggles, but not because we said it’s gonna be a tit-for-tat: “I’ll do this if you’ll do that. I’ll come to your demo Wednesday if you come to mine Thursday.” We did it because we knew it was a fight we had to join and be a part of. And it strengthened all—"

      feinberg-sicko

  • Infamousblt [any]@hexbear.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    55
    ·
    1 year ago

    Ah more vile shit about how AKCHTUALLY all those queer Hexbears aren’t actually queer. Please keep invalidating my identity libs maybe eventually if you hate me enough I might want to join your hateful little shit club