• 🇰 🔵 🇱 🇦 🇳 🇦 🇰 ℹ️@yiffit.net
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    ·
    edit-2
    25 days ago

    And this is why I have always hated every single jackass that responded to a question with “just Google it” even when Google didn’t completely suck cock.

    If I had just one single answer from a reputable source doing that, I wouldn’t be asking real people. Search engines were never infallible. Niche topics have always garnered shit results.

    • chiliedogg@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      24 days ago

      A lot of people don’t consider the future even when writing helpful posts. I’m as guilty as anyone.

      If you link the correct answer, the person finding your post in 6 years better hope the link is still good. That’s the legitimate reason scholarly papers needs to cite specific book editions and journal page numbers instead of using hyperlinks in a bibliography.

      If a copy of the book or journal can ba tracked down, the citation will still work.

      It’s also why online-only published journals are still often formatted like a book with static pages instead of websites. If you find a journal article that’s important, you’ll likely still be able to find an achived copy in PDF somewhere even if the journal stops publishing or they change domains or whatever.