The reporter who broke the New York Post's bombshell story on the Hunter Biden laptop speaks out after the legacy media rejected the scandal during the 2020 election.
Once again your 5th grade reading skills let you down. In my original reply, I disputing that Hunters laptop only contained dick & drug picks.
My initial reply
It’s not just dick and drug pics on the laptop.
I don’t care what Joe’s kids do any more than I care what Trump’s kids do. As long as they’re not involved in whatever it is, why should anyone give a shit? You still haven’t answered this part.
Petty insults don’t make arguments for you. You still haven’t elaborated on what ties any of this to Joe or why anyone should care.
I explicitly said none of the emails implicated Joe. The logical explanation for your lack of understanding is you’re slow and can’t comprehend simple sentences.
What are you trying to do here apart from rage on Hunter? Why are you even caring enough to comment here at all?
If you could read and understand my original comment you would know I was disputing the claim that his emails were just drug and dick picks.
You keep asking why you should care, that question is irrelivent as your actions show you care deeply. I don’t know why you care so deeply were you just looking for a win in this argument?
The only exception is if Joe is implicated. But you haven’t shown any concrete evidence that this is the case.
You keep making an argument against Joe being involved, from the start I’ve stated there’s no evidence he was involved. I don’t know how it’s so confusing for you to understand but here we are.
Therefore it just seems like you just want to hate this guy, implying you’re the one who cares. Prove me wrong.
I hate the guy by saying there’s no evidence he’s involved? That might be the dumbest thought to ooze out of your head.
Once again your 5th grade reading skills let you down. In my original reply, I disputing that Hunters laptop only contained dick & drug picks.
My initial reply
You clearly do care just based on your replies.
deleted by creator
I explicitly said none of the emails implicated Joe. The logical explanation for your lack of understanding is you’re slow and can’t comprehend simple sentences.
If you could read and understand my original comment you would know I was disputing the claim that his emails were just drug and dick picks.
deleted by creator
Keep disputing a point get proven wrong then jump to some irrelivent point.
This whole conversation has your jimmies rustled so it must have some relevance to you.
deleted by creator
You keep asking why you should care, that question is irrelivent as your actions show you care deeply. I don’t know why you care so deeply were you just looking for a win in this argument?
deleted by creator
You keep making an argument against Joe being involved, from the start I’ve stated there’s no evidence he was involved. I don’t know how it’s so confusing for you to understand but here we are.
I hate the guy by saying there’s no evidence he’s involved? That might be the dumbest thought to ooze out of your head.