• xmunk@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    87
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    5 months ago

    Good for him - he’s less innocent than folks like Chelsea Manning or Edward Snowden but a heavy prosecution of him would definitely have a chilling effect on whistle-blowers. Did he release things at politically convenient times? Yes. Should that be illegal? Fuck no.

    • bamboo@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      40
      arrow-down
      7
      ·
      5 months ago

      2016 Assange was a very different person than who he was in 2009. The espionage charges relating to the Chelsea Manning leaks were always bogus, but his involvement with the Trump campaign solidified him as a huge asshole in my mind.

      https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/2017/11/14/563996442/donald-trump-jr-had-direct-contact-with-wikileaks-during-campaign

      Even back then, WikiLeaks was telling trump to claim the election was rigged and stolen. These are not the actions of a whistleblower, and it’s clear he was not a whistleblower (or working with whistleblowers) during this period and likely a mouthpiece for Russia to sow division in the US.

    • rottingleaf
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      5 months ago

      but a heavy prosecution of him would definitely have a chilling effect on whistle-blowers

      As if the last decade plus of his life were not enough for that. Better than a life sentence, yeah.