• Bye@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    arrow-down
    8
    ·
    3 days ago

    2-factor would be fine if it didn’t have to involve my phone. It’s such a pain in the ass. Like a second password would be fine, so my password manager could just do both at once.

    • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      I don’t think you get why 2fa is more secure. That would be basically the same as having one password.

    • slazer2au@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 days ago

      KeepassXC can hold your password and your otop codes. It is recommended to use different databases tho.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      Ελληνικά
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      3 days ago

      A second password would not be 2FA, it would just be two passwords.

      2 Factor refers to 2 different ways of proving your identity. Something you know (your password) and something you have (your phone). You can also get dedicated 2FA devices, they look like a little USB drive with a screen, but honestly, they are more of a pain to deal with than your phone, and most 2FA systems do not have support for all the different brands and devices.

    • Kess8a@lemy.lol
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      3 days ago

      There are options for 2fa for desktop, for Windows and Linux^. You could have multiple devices with your 2fa codes, makes it not as bad if your phone breaks.

      ^ (though from my experience with the Windows ones they are not as robust, but they get the job done)

      Edit: syntax jank…