• kusivittula@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    are these numbers a sum from like 30 years? or made up? because they seem unbelievably high to be yearly averages

      • bobs_monkey@lemm.ee
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m actually more amazed at how sparklers were represented there. Compared to m80s and turbo tubes, they’re so benign

        • sp3ctr4l
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          People think they are safer because they do not explode, they just sparkle!

          And they give them to kids and drunk people who run around wildly with them.

          They do not realize that sparklers are basically sticks of shitty thermite, burning at 2000 F.

          If you had a candle or even a piece of kindling set on fire, and were waving it around willy nilly and bumped into someone, it’d hurt for a bit, but you could probably treat it with cold water, a minor burn.

          Two fucking thousand degrees?

          Different story.

          • Fermion@feddit.nl
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            8
            ·
            edit-2
            4 months ago

            In addition to the temperature difference, if an ember is shoved into something, the portion in contact is cut off from air and the burning rate slows/stops at the point of contact. Pyrotechnics like in sparklers have an oxidizer mixed in and will continue to burn even/especially with tight contact. Sparklers actually burn faster/hotter when compressed. Taping a whole bunch of sparklers tightly together becomes explosive.

            Plus a lot of sparklers have a metal wire core that is efficient at transferring heat to skin. Whereas wood and charcoal are relatively insulating.

            • sp3ctr4l
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              This is correct, and I appreciate the furthering of explaining why sparklers are deceptively dangerous.

              People just assume its like a more familiar kind of fire and thus dramatically underestimate the danger.

              Also I was going to mention the bomb thing but I decided not to, but uh yeah lol, its kind of wild that shit is legal at all, given that its pretty fucking easy to make a significantly dangerous explosive out of and, at least as far as I am aware, you basically buy all that shit with cash, unlike other types of chemicals which can be made into bombs which are pretty heavily monitored and regulated.

    • Sc00ter@lemm.ee
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      4 months ago

      As someone who shoots professionally, these numbers feel low to me. The stupid shit I see every day folks do makes me wonder how they’re still legal without a license