• ganymede@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      66
      arrow-down
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      not sure if you’re being sarcastic, but if anything this news paints linux deployment in an even better light.

      • 𝙲𝚑𝚊𝚒𝚛𝚖𝚊𝚗 𝙼𝚎𝚘𝚠@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        69
        arrow-down
        9
        ·
        4 months ago

        Nah, but there were some Linux evangelists claiming this couldn’t possibly happen to Linux and it only happened to Windows because Windows is bad. And it was your own fault for getting this BSOD if you’re still running Windows.

        And sure, Windows bad and all, but this one wasn’t really Microsofts fault.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          16
          arrow-down
          6
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          The sane ones of us know well that a faulty driver is a faulty driver, but! Linux culture is different. Which is why this happened so spectacularly with Windows. EDIT: and not with Linux

          • dan@upvote.au
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            I’ve had the proprietary Nvidia driver crash my whole system a few times. Hoping their new open-source driver (not nouveau, I mean the new out-of-tree open-source one) is better.

            • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              4 months ago

              I had X crash due to Nvidia under FreeBSD a few times, and fewer kernel panics due to it. Never used Linux with Nvidia though.

          • vext01@lemmy.sdf.org
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            19
            ·
            4 months ago

            Yeah, it supports kernel modules, so is also vulnerable to bad third party kernel code.

            • Petter1@lemm.ee
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              10
              arrow-down
              3
              ·
              4 months ago

              🤔if nobody makes a third party kernel module, then there is still no risk

        • Ferris@infosec.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          if they dont know the boot sequence is a thing maybe their opinion on this doesnt really matter 🤷🏼

      • DasAlbatross@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        I’m not shocked at all, but there seems to be a very sizable number of people on Lemmy who think if people just used Linux there’d never be another problem or exploit again, which is ridiculous. Mac users used to feel the same way until the market share started to grow and all of the sudden you’re seeing news of serious exploits.

    • Alborlin@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      6
      ·
      4 months ago

      Haven’t you heard 4% market is captured by Linux , it’s the ONLY saviour os out there , windows users and macos users are idiots and all Lemmy Linux dudebros grandpa’s are using Linux without single problem. Despite the fact that each Linux had it’s own shell and there is no escape from terminal ( in 2024) if you even as try to use something more complicated. ;)

      • Realitaetsverlust
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        For almost every use case a normal user needs, there is a gui. You do not need the terminal.

        • Alborlin@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Tell me where to find executables for programs installed without using Terminal , a very very clickable task in windows

          • Realitaetsverlust
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            4 months ago

            Huh? if you install anything via a software manager which is included with most user-friendly distros like Ubuntu, popos, mint or zorin, it comes with a .desktop file which makes it discoverable by using the means of the desktop environment - usually something like the start menu. And that’s not something new. That has been the case for years now.