FenrirIII@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 4 months agoExploited ruleslrpnk.netimagemessage-square45fedilinkarrow-up1881arrow-down113file-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
arrow-up1868arrow-down1imageExploited ruleslrpnk.netFenrirIII@lemmy.world to Work Reform@lemmy.world · 4 months agomessage-square45fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: [email protected]
minus-square𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up23arrow-down2·4 months agoTo make their line go up, they must make your line go down.
minus-squareiknowitwheniseeit@lemmynsfw.comlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·4 months agoNot necessarily. Increases in productivity could have been split between labor and capital, giving benefits to both. (Or even better, gone just to labor, but that would not be a “both lines go up” scenario.)
minus-square𝕸𝖔𝖘𝖘@infosec.publinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·edit-24 months agoYes. I was referring to how capitalism tended to have worked in the past decade or so, and not to how to actually make the line go up. E: autocorrect
To make their line go up, they must make your line go down.
Not necessarily.
Increases in productivity could have been split between labor and capital, giving benefits to both. (Or even better, gone just to labor, but that would not be a “both lines go up” scenario.)
Yes. I was referring to how capitalism tended to have worked in the past decade or so, and not to how to actually make the line go up.
E: autocorrect