In this post, I saw a lot of people coming to Bad Empanada’s defense, and felt like they may be uninformed about his actual positions of things, so I felt that this ought to be posted.
In this post, I saw a lot of people coming to Bad Empanada’s defense, and felt like they may be uninformed about his actual positions of things, so I felt that this ought to be posted.
BadEmpadanus is like Lysenko in that he has two good takes and the rest are all bad. He is unlike Lysenko in that Lysenko wasn’t a thinly-veiled fascist who intentionally decided to help further colonize Argentina.
Personally I will say that I think we should go further and work towards fewer empanadas as they are not a significant part of a healthy diet.
Let’s compromise and agree he is kinda like Kropotkin because they both have names that are kind of funny, and that you can have a good empanada once in a while, as a treat