• sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    10
    ·
    4 months ago

    Apparently they don’t understand that the F in F-Droid is for FOSS.

    I’m 100% all for adding a repository with paid apps, but it’s not and shouldn’t be marketed as F-Droid.

    • aard@kyu.de
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      Paid and FOSS are not mutually exclusive. You can always build packages yourself if you don’t want to pay. A well executed implementation might allow some projects to drop or reduce their play store efforts.

      • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Paid and FOSS are mutually exclusive. Open source and FOSS aren’t.

        But how, you ask? Free means having the right to do whatever you want with your copy including make copies and redistribute. Thus, how can it be free while demanding a payment before allowing usage?

        That’s why I said, FOSS Droid? Nah! Open Source Droid? Knock yourself out. I’m actually looking forward to supporting some of the developers of apps I love.

        • Avid Amoeba@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          7
          ·
          4 months ago

          One of the things you’re free to do is pay for a copy of the binary. Therefore you haven’t shown that FOSS and paid are mutually exclusive. 😁

        • Undearius@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          15
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          And the “free” means “freedom”, it doesn’t mean “no price”

        • rtxn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Free does not mean “no payment, ever”. If the source code and build toolchain are openly and completely available, but prebuilt binaries are paid-only, it still satisfies the “free as in gratis” criterion.

          • Possibly linux
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            arrow-down
            3
            ·
            4 months ago

            Unless the payment method involves proprietary software. Also online payments are service as a software substitute (SaaS)

    • folkrav@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      15
      ·
      4 months ago

      The F stands for “free” as in “freedom”, not “free beer”.

      • Possibly linux
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        4 months ago

        Stripe is not free software nor is any online payment system these days.

        Not to mention online payments come at the cost of privacy

        • folkrav@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          4 months ago

          Neither of your statements are antithetical to mine.

    • Possibly linux
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      4 months ago

      It stands for freedom as in protecting the 4 free software freedoms.

      • sabreW4K3@lazysoci.al
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        4 months ago

        The freedom part, unless they use an ad network that doesn’t track users or impressions.