• pyre@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    15
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    4 months ago

    the method which almost the entire world uses in one way or another?

    no it totally make sense that if a candidate wins a state by 50.1% then the votes of the 49.9% should go directly to the winner as well.

    the fact that you can lose the popular vote and is win an election is fucking bananas.

    winner takes all is extremely undemocratic.

    • blockheadjt@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      4 months ago

      the fact that you can lose the popular vote and is win an election is fucking bananas

      That is not due to winner-take-all, it’s due to the electoral college

        • HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          4 months ago

          it votes for single seat positions. you can call it a winner take all or proportional or whatever you want, functionally it will be the same.