• ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      edit-2
      24 days ago

      The phrasing of the law would most likely allow use of VPN for commercial use but ban for private use, so it’s unlikely to have a major impact on coorporate IT work in general.

      The article also mentions this VPN ban in a context of VPN services being marketed specifically for piracy use as the scope rather than “legitimate” VPN services in general.

      But yeah, these people can get bent…

      • B0rax@feddit.org
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        24 days ago

        So how would that work? You can not distinguish between commercial or private use, because the traffic is encrypted, you don’t know what is transmitted, that is the whole point.

        • needanke@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          24 days ago

          You can still see which vpn you are using, which is likely the rout they’d go. That and going after the private VPN providers.

            • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              8
              ·
              24 days ago

              Enforcing that you need a business licence to buy a VPN is easy and requires very little. They suddenly can’t sell you a subscription if you can’t provide the business licence.

              • FMFM@lemm.ee
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                20 days ago

                Sure, but that only works if you’re purchasing a VPN that follows the same law. My VPN couldn’t give a fuck less about my country’s legislation

      • Jim@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        24 days ago

        They’re asking for TV manufacturers to block a VPN app in the TV. Not to block VPN in general.

        • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          24 days ago

          No you just need to disallow VPN providers to sell access without a business licence, that way the VPN provider can’t legally give you access to their network unless you’re a registered business, and it would simultaneously remove options for anonymous subscription like mullvad VPN.

            • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              24 days ago

              But what a PITA it would be if you have to use a seedbox for everything, and also expensive if you want/need to keep seeding torrents for extended periods of time so you’re not just doing hit’n’runs. But yeah, piracy is pretty much always going to find a way to exist.

              And seedboxes of course does nothing for the far more important general online privacy.

              • Findmysec@infosec.pub
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                24 days ago

                I believe the general population will have to become savvy enough to run their own VPNs from their personal VPSes. Also there are affordable seedbox providers which will let you have a decent amount of bandwidth for seeding, but yes I generally agree with your point. We need more upload bandwidth with seedboxes

            • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              23 days ago

              If they are required by law to only sell to business with a valid licence, they also have to document that all their customers in that country have a valid business licence.

              By selling it to someone private, even by proxy, would be illegal and they would be liable to lawsuits by doing so.

              • conciselyverbose@sh.itjust.works
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                23 days ago

                Only if they give a shit about some random country’s shit law.

                There are some treaties in play that allow copyright law to be enforced in some other jurisdictions, but that’s a far cry from a VPN. Switzerland isn’t going to help you enforce nonsense judgements against companies that don’t break any of their laws or laws most of the first world respects.

                • ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  1
                  ·
                  23 days ago

                  Unfortunately this is likely from an EU country, which usually carries a little more weight when it comes to cross-border law enforcement co-op.