While I think something like this makes sense, the pricing seems off. For $600 you can build a PC with a desktop GPU. If you want to make it easy to set up, you could just use an off the shelf mini-PC and preinstall everything so a non-technical user can get started without any hassle. I really hope we’ll see more Steam machine like devices in the future.

  • SavvyWolf@pawb.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    3 months ago

    Tbh I’m kind of worried seeing a software group get into hardware. There are a lot of hidden costs and production issues which provide difficult challenges. I hope they succeed, but I worry this will just flop and cost them a lot of money.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 months ago

      That’s a very distinct possibility. Which is another argument for using as little bespoke hardware as possible for a project like this.

  • just_another_person@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    3 months ago

    I’m super confused here…

    EmuDeck is basically a collection of installer scripts that installs EmulationStation and Retroarch. It doesn’t really do much else, and it’s really not a good piece of software at that.

    Why is this person trying to make standalone hardware?

  • solsangraal
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    i read that as EmoDuck, so that’s what i’m calling it

  • Mesophar@lemm.ee
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    That kind of seems like that is exactly what these are. The specs are still sort of terrible, though, but pricing isn’t too far off for what is advertised in them.

    • Diplomjodler@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      3 months ago

      The more expensive one uses a mobile GPU. Using a desktop GPU would make for a much more powerful machine. And as far as the cheaper model is concerned, you could get a much more powerful off the shelf device for that money. So you’re basically just paying for the snazzy case. Which is fine of course, but I think they could have done better.

  • f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    3 months ago

    EmuDeck uses EmulationStation, in which I’ve seen a lot of controller-related problems. Controllers working in the menu but not in the emulators. Controllers working in the emulators but not in the menus.

    For a dedicated emulation machine, I’ll once again shill for Lakka, that boots LibreELEC directly into RetroArch without EmulationStation, and has bootable installers for multiple configurations of x86_64 machines and images for loads of single-board computers.

    • ampersandrew@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 months ago

      I haven’t had any problems here. From what I can tell, it just hands all the input and display off to your configured emulator of choice once you make the selection, so once you boot the game, it’s however you’ve got that emulator configured.

      • f4f4f4f4f4f4f4f4@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 months ago

        Maybe they’ve finally fixed those problems. In Lakka, I set my controller up once (for each unique controller) in RetroArch frontend, and then it works in any emulator core. I don’t think it’s normal to have to set up the controller in each core (but you can, if you want or need to!)

  • drspod@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    3 months ago

    You can see the planned specs for the two different models on their indiegogo page: https://www.indiegogo.com/projects/emudeck-machines-retro-emulation-console-pc#/

    I’m guessing they have a pre-selected all-in-one board (designed for mobile devices) and they’re just designing a chassis around it. There’s still a lot that could go wrong, but it’s a bit more achievable than actually designing, testing and assembling your own board.

  • Lomkey@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    3 months ago

    Just comes to support and hands off to do anything then be worth it for the cost.