• MaXimus421@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    12
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 months ago

    It was a Lion King movie. Of course people paid to go see it. Box office profits (tickets sold) do not equate to an enjoyable film.

    I’ve never heard of anyone IRL or online claim that film was worthy of their time.

    We all got catfished on that one but I’m not surprised. You cannot remake a classic. It will work only 1 time out of 50. The odds are never good.

    Jungle Book was an exception, imo.

    • CosmoNova@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      2 months ago

      I know a person who loved the movie. Of course they haven‘t watched the original nor do they intend to because cartoons „are for children“. Some folks just watch anything that just gets advertised enough I guess.

    • hex@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 months ago

      I watched both, liked both. I don’t think it’s that deep. It was just The Lion King with new voices and new visuals.

      What do people generally dislike about it? Just that it’s a remake of a film?

      • Maven (famous)
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 months ago

        It’s a remake of the film but with less emotion and far less fun.

        Making it photorealistic and trying to limit yourself to real film techniques limits things heavily and meant that you couldn’t show the same emotions on all of the characters that you could before.

        I also firmly believe that replacing Rowan Atkinson was the worst decision Disney had made since hiring Jake Paul.