GreenEngineering3475@lemmy.world to Hardware@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agoIntel cans 20A process nodewww.theregister.comexternal-linkmessage-square4fedilinkarrow-up113arrow-down11file-text
arrow-up112arrow-down1external-linkIntel cans 20A process nodewww.theregister.comGreenEngineering3475@lemmy.world to Hardware@lemmy.worldEnglish · 2 months agomessage-square4fedilinkfile-text
minus-squareAdmiral Patrick@dubvee.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoDumb question: What unit of measurement is “A” in this context? Angstrom?
minus-squareDudewitbowlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·2 months agoyes angstrom. we are st the age of fab nodes where nm isnt precise enough measurmenet under 3nm
minus-squareAdmiral Patrick@dubvee.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 months agoThanks. That’s what I thought but guess I couldn’t believe we were there. Last I really read (which has been a while), below 3nm, quantum tunneling became a problem. I guess we’ve addressed that in the fab process.
minus-squareScratch@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·2 months agoRemember that the reported nm resolution is kinda arbitrary and laced with marketing wank.
Dumb question: What unit of measurement is “A” in this context? Angstrom?
yes angstrom. we are st the age of fab nodes where nm isnt precise enough measurmenet under 3nm
Thanks. That’s what I thought but guess I couldn’t believe we were there. Last I really read (which has been a while), below 3nm, quantum tunneling became a problem. I guess we’ve addressed that in the fab process.
Remember that the reported nm resolution is kinda arbitrary and laced with marketing wank.